Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.2K bytes:
> ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> skribis:
> 
> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.8K bytes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> > Looking at the deprecated repo, it is not clear what needs to be
> >> > done. Possibly the now deprecated lxqt-common has been broken up in
> >> > various per-component repositories.
> >> 
> >> Andreas, ng0: any idea?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ludo’.
> >> 
> >
> > So the Archlinux PKGBUILD uses:
> > source=(
> > 	"https://github.com/lxde/$pkgname/releases/download/$pkgver/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.xz"
> > 	"https://github.com/lxde/$pkgname/releases/download/$pkgver/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.xz.asc"
> > Gentoo uses:
> > if [[ ${PV} = *9999* ]]; then
> > 	inherit git-r3
> > 	EGIT_REPO_URI="git://git.lxde.org/git/lxde/${PN}.git"
> > else
> > 	SRC_URI="https://downloads.lxqt.org/lxqt/${PV}/${P}.tar.xz"
> > 	KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86"
> > fi
> >
> > I seem to remember that for the lxqt I work on in one of my branches
> > I used the lxqt.org domain.
> 
> Using tarballs from downloads.lxqt.org sounds like a good idea.
> 
> However, regardless of this, what’s up with the lxqt-common deprecation?
> Is it replaced by something else?  Should we just remove it?
> 
> I’m clueless about LXQt so any suggestions is welcome.  :-)

And so am I. I have no idea, not until I start reading into the topic of
the inner connections and the current state of LXQT. As long as we don't know
for sure, and other projects don't remove it from their package repositories
I see no immediate need to remove it.

> Ludo’.
> 
-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/
https://www.infotropique.org https://ng0.infotropique.org