From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e36HV-0000Nh-Je for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:10:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e36HS-0003j5-F0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:10:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58003) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e36HS-0003j1-Bw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e36HS-0003P0-1R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:10:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28769] [PATCH] gnu: services: Add php-fpm. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:09:00 +0100 From: Christopher Baines Message-ID: <20171013210900.6a709a78@cbaines.net> In-Reply-To: <20171013210608.69664320@cbaines.net> References: <9fe1701f-d78f-ba3a-37eb-64417337a55b@cock.li> <20171013210608.69664320@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/8NQ0QztdUnd5qSkz.qCkPEc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: nee Cc: 28769@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/8NQ0QztdUnd5qSkz.qCkPEc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 21:06:08 +0100 Christopher Baines wrote: > On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 23:54:24 +0200 > nee wrote: ... > > +(define (version-major version-string) > > + "Return the major version number as string from the > > version-string." > > + (version-prefix version-string 1)) > > + =20 >=20 > Seems fine to me. I'm guessing that you added this because it was > convenient, but I can't see it being used in the next patch, have I > missed it? Yep, I missed it, but I see it now, problem solved :) --Sig_/8NQ0QztdUnd5qSkz.qCkPEc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlnhHVxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XfTAQ/9HzX47E7FNlwzHze6X28d0bZ3RSB5suqpmZlqXzz9G591VPMaJdQJTx/J xK73hHS00wXCrrAHXn8DXmr7Sls5bPcPW8G4mdO+gxLTj5GUHD5DhOJhXikwnI1l a9wyu0b3iJQ84UyWTW9DvXWyx9S+cez3LQkez3f6JiMHi3/+1288ea9/lYaEZToG Uq/KgEBc1flmx3IW4YVG7dw2RUV8AmE0JMMsHVy8OJ7D6d9/c6uk7wLa1zZI61J0 oSMdNJpZAFNC4o62zEFXO10tNtkYJE+Ne7wqYtJd4zbDuLoNF+OuR/t2rhYhziOO wf7KPA96tCsuKAE7qKvK1Gj5KXR3Ch/NNAnQtQVED/wKu38TYB3RSEe9XHzxDSlG ga3wlJul6HhpiOZe62nDaPZXvTfR/tQnYT+M7zGvSivVZZ4TsWTmNgqf3aRxtJDa 06SgDhYbvlDWWiOOM0gtHVIsp7epuT0VgqPwHNCRSoVBpzZ0NaWXOLy1H9ZcySfi G8eyGIHJfpLtUlPb+yjZBFa+NQS0R0/0tlOzqvPQxNPyB41zpmNeN09XZyFBuG7i kBenB6P5zJbTyvO6Ygr9khu/kDYrs4wkANrRKOtS414W/7/RGz8kqKYdTgo3DijQ SbgQDEUGTwaH5jeyTiSDn9ZjAirP2M3nhgOqXMgDBtwLnj2xU5U= =LsqT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8NQ0QztdUnd5qSkz.qCkPEc--