From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz8VS-0007PO-V2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:44:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz8VP-0006Lm-28 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:44:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dz8VO-0006Ka-KW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dz8VO-0007GG-7f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:44:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28586] go-build-system and Syncthing Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:42:59 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171002214259.GA25642@jasmine.lan> References: <20170924203651.GA29973@jasmine.lan> <20171002202325.GA12172@jasmine.lan> <20171002210103.4huokkwrkhanmxig@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171002210103.4huokkwrkhanmxig@abyayala> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: ng0 Cc: 28586@debbugs.gnu.org --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:01:03PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Would it be nitpicking to make the requirements of syncthing be individual commits? > Is this simply okay with initializing the file if it doesn't make any sense > to have smaller commit steps? I could do that (not sure if we have a policy or not). But I sent it as one patch to make it easier to review. > I'm excited to try the go-build-system out for some of the Go stuff I > wanted to package. Please, try it and give feedback :) --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlnSstsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwix7w//bOpjDIAJp00N/JiMa4IdW3Ei46O9zuk17V2LsOSQgGYrI2oLNpAFRE2V osOUqk5W0ysnQA8UsT4UQDIvYFQ6tLhjxQT3+iFNZAxawdkvmKRDxRYdhPGuvbxW CPiUgCH25Kgmjie8MQuokOElqTGLE2w7gtFXInj3gkjrMfG/EFk9le2aEoA7+5l7 eifHGIjgd3xB8U4P+/5ZqjoK6xNqKxhBdh/0/q7a9YVqi6HvIKg9SP7NkhfWpyAB XM9xrJ16zf3K8HUTjkpYTP2/xfVGi4feJYwS5cRI6DMqZWevkLD0mo5K0ri1tRSz clsCTqzePdg2ZiLeSPFixoyNZnHF7buIPfOxS+clzKFt1NZbqPPFgEvbAr2cmcDC C1nsCXj7UfX8slZAstcE6r5mPaK2z/WJDdrH7ESX71FT3/ipFr953eTgqm0B/BXV FgtnyXJhcoB73TedFnjnrhYbpeDX8Z5JbIYrAgUhihARHYfIjP6nchj9dHZV2hSJ RGHVeSnwLWyXfOxcMjElC0v4Y9at0/S/C6a2ODy5x5qNfn9AsaAZSdFLgd9CFEYM 10nIMIH8K1pQ3QeYQ3DepByxzllTegHolwPWD5yhWxLFf4hhw5XT4v6lW+E4TKvH Nn3sepTAFvZkWGX+gQK9ic6Nit/iQ2rTYnsIB8kDhjFIg/IqN/Q= =Om95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--