From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIrC-0002Xc-2s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:35:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIr8-0007Cr-IJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:35:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIr8-0007BU-B3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIr7-0005Bg-Te for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:35:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#28170] Add gnutls/dane + use it where its needed (gnurl, libmicrohttpd, gnunet) Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:34:44 +0100 From: Christopher Baines Message-ID: <20170930153444.3e49436f@cbaines.net> In-Reply-To: <20170930141255.yrnasw4aenfl77n4@abyayala> References: <20170821095726.qtf2ko526nup4yba@abyayala> <20170930122616.17079913@cbaines.net> <20170930122309.akl2dxa46eru36pb@abyayala> <20170930134346.54a4c54a@cbaines.net> <20170930140144.yenmf7pr2ffecmll@abyayala> <20170930141255.yrnasw4aenfl77n4@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/W3AHAW//=iZ3RG=SMFhglzx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: ng0 Cc: 28170@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/W3AHAW//=iZ3RG=SMFhglzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:12:55 +0000 ng0 wrote: > The fix in this version is to only add the necessary input > to the inherited gnutls. Ok. One hopefully final thing. From the commit message [1], it's not clear to me if this is fixing an issue with the GNUnet package, by providing it with the right dependencies, or, adding additional functionality to the GNUnet package, by providing a more capable GnuTLS? 1: "GNUnet and its dependency chain needs GnuTLS with DANE support." --Sig_/W3AHAW//=iZ3RG=SMFhglzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlnPq4RfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XcovhAAmJKu7V1U1PvB9UiixC6QvlszTia1avfYSAlh6o4cKOQj0MoLjDUsHa0o ryGWgYcLVnrwbiIACttMprqHiLIcsi2mpudg+WH8Ib7KhCj04hYSqEaTwI/cIuW/ tsMRB7ZQ+xpHmaLtMMAMBqTGKyeKiiN0lMENBgmyxq9fozCFeff2LnFR4V9QGM7Y y62eUtEzxfZIs/M+DQtXD8TkspwluFuEBNzKjslPU3tgd5u2YYtNEuc4UfKLKDhl s+vpXQy6qpgN4sqmorJn4gXVHsrrzATA9q9/ndSPTl2Pc3bj8ZfqOjR/Zn28i8+N eC6VVqx/PHY/VkLK3pkWIUS3jP9hFBNDvasTTYng9eeDdSbzErBkKe5zXsMpDjkc QLqq0iVfzgTmfe35HmEjFM01RCMLmpOe7uNKo0nJi6VihsVkp3VtVUnT23AiDFtf zQzQ6JTt9cL6oD56RPRQxSMCXGQCZ8Z1aBPYpnWOtOT7TSDFR0AD8HrRnGMfdqEY QmUAchBUNcWofMzXmxqenVk7rK8DE32SGnr1xU05qVU2k2FqtRbhjxfwfVm7VLi3 W83QzWNvHaWpkI8S+JYX/OuduxWnDW3b3ukq3NwGuETtpDf+nnbuMP/Dnpt6loKg frT7fgdZOMUpbMUPxf1+qdJwqUzxvwhxX/Pb7dDn8Vd2m4QQXcY= =v0nh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/W3AHAW//=iZ3RG=SMFhglzx--