From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIjS-0001Sk-P4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:27:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIjO-0005R0-JR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIjO-0005Qm-Fy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyIjO-0004yl-9E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:27:02 -0400 Subject: bug#28276: pybitmessage: Update to 0.6.2 Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 15:26:33 +0100 From: Christopher Baines Message-ID: <20170930152633.4efe2816@cbaines.net> In-Reply-To: <20170930141838.jflmpdk4vs74cl2z@abyayala> References: <20170829123858.3jeimmucctlkfmse@abyayala> <20170829131655.zjwzrpejfukjrfp3@abyayala> <20170829134714.nu5tmyour4zgqfaj@abyayala> <20170829135311.n4io2ah6cazzod7c@abyayala> <20170829140604.smppzepq4wmsjwcj@abyayala> <20170930151346.5eb7e5b5@cbaines.net> <20170930141838.jflmpdk4vs74cl2z@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/e4pz88fiPTGSgKhc1pN8Wel"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: ng0 Cc: 28276-done@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/e4pz88fiPTGSgKhc1pN8Wel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:18:38 +0000 ng0 wrote: > Christopher Baines transcribed 1.5K bytes: > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:06:04 +0000 > > ng0 wrote: > > =20 > > > Last version of patch. =20 > >=20 > > I've had a look at the patch attached, and it looks ok to me (I've > > never used pybitmessage). If you can confirm that this is definitely > > good to be merged, I'm happy to merge it? =20 >=20 > I don't use Bitmessage anymore, but > I have used this patch to send some messages around. That sounds ok to me. I've now merged this patch :) --Sig_/e4pz88fiPTGSgKhc1pN8Wel Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlnPqZlfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XeSZQ//Yg5A1qLCpMOrzV3yXn+9tXwmY520EtMwHwEtA2ZVGhRIs0FdWsgU2b0Z wgJaij4xZYk3mGo+i8PAloVuNTUrA9Jb0470VA3lYy0UTpqs1A5MAQrvmR24Jg+c auxSyNneCkVMh00P206R54FROpSW2EibUkpS8QPEzHaA3D5izZ3Ubdrd6Wdzgg1B +NAoQDnLKDtSPIiZk0XnHcv8ySW71slq9wTuNHbIffwwVrREMjkWMIFcfEAGPLkB uxALrKCI35bjqWjAx+BZ1oz78BDC7vWQc2/NpZk0CQYZcKoNKmrosiD26HeRRuCD FkqwSR+x7hokx9Zzt4n8/7GksbeSo2kGy3TtH/7DpJS+meLvGqrBaTAvTAqMKJ01 1lmAb2oQ1aCh1Rt5BSv1vtRE8fEnXl1kkYislYrrLKq+OjFT13YezhdKRYTxzs6w xY1nMCgNufFvVc+bUAykzpsanpSBY/3chaP+eDYjOdPI1mCPNgn+ATcGGZWBtiJz 9h7xm1L9rfbwqA5VNcC9CvRk9m4/Js4GL8dU+1l1Nbd7ECM/qAhYrXd36gJMpJVe LwHIhSGppIeH7uBlJDlH1WOW/PquA2dlLrXgXxLj/skWM4GKL6yoamuk+9Avwt5+ teph7Ze9SqnRXiU8+eV6h2QhPamUmrWu1VT+nzG4pQFiSBox47c= =mDxZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/e4pz88fiPTGSgKhc1pN8Wel--