Christopher Baines transcribed 2.1K bytes: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:57:26 +0000 > ng0 wrote: > > > The dependency chain of GNUnet demands GnuTLS with DANE support. > > You can use it without DANE, but there are certain parts which > > will not work. DANE is recommended. (ports of FREEBSD uses > > gnutls-dane for libmicrohttpd aswell for example). > > > From c9dedfd1a6f91d557006b00505a428be84102b1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: ng0 > > Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:28:51 +0000 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: gnutls: Add 'gnutls-dane'. > > > > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls/dane): New variable. > > Hey, so I'm trying to do some reviewing. > > What was your reasoning for creating a new gnutls/dane package, rather > than adding unbound to the existing gnutls package? > > I don't know much about GnuTLS, but it would be good to make it clear > why this approach was taken, especially in the commit message and by > the gnutls/dane package definition. Honestly, I did not want to touch the gnutls package for this. I wanted to leave the option open to have gnutls without dane. Sure, it's a useful feature. If you think I should apply it directly to gnutls, tell me and I'll send a new patch. -- ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org