From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dws4k-0005W4-N6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:47:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dws4b-0003dN-Aw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:47:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dws4b-0003dH-7J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:47:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dws4b-0008B5-0N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:47:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27922] [PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:46:20 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170926154620.GB11123@jasmine.lan> References: <87d18dwwyi.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170802224834.GE14798@jasmine.lan> <87vaky1u0m.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmlxhe8y.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bmlxhe8y.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Thomas Danckaert , 27922@debbugs.gnu.org --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:48:45PM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Thomas Danckaert skribis: > > I can push a modified patch (with the pypi source) if it's ok. Is there > > any reason we would not update to version 1.13.1 rightaway? >=20 > If the dependents of NumPy build fine, I see no reason not to upgrade to > 1.13.1. >=20 > Thanks for picking this up! Yes, thank you! I got distracted and had to take a little break, which is why this patch fell by the wayside. --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlnKdkwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg7IQ/+LzdVUbbDPQBMcDjnjHxzW8KTTglbzZO3XxHpBuhjKhGfPwM1BC8pXyvr lub6fLfJKQP58CbhdpwkLYpcINxb+pNRgCP+HiVcV/8jsQkdFM+n87R563VGnqYr wf4lbGV9GEApHY58DFW8kNaKrqm0eVHcuNrDquRaM5I3cgKSOmxyKiCifA/JJPoR K79IqSkr1O90Q4rQMjfAdZbDBYOUHVKNotdV5aZrnp2SLRwI5F07EYLmtBKdSPUF I8TsT49mjRnnNz1ICZogG1/8XFxicXTlkmEBGSgVsQqh/C84o7lqyvRq4mLcV0Lb bCxkOZeeXA3kD9uCYoiYZT9r23h5BibpRuIqJeAAsEOdsyje47pZd0NdpDxdSc3u wHUgrXUrKbDdgcWyvT4j00qxt57iWwhVexOb/oVLHsU2c+EqYVj9/tp6OF7QGt7F Ec1nWCxAagdeOuodDowR3Ofz3n0PPVykgu5gN+Jq1Ig6ZFkug17R2gKyShtQVC9U BCxBNAvZ3igt3D6UhDrFoJoQBGCfVHhQNrczQInkWUx5+VR9pPX+gqQvhSR5SzrI Qj5/1iuhU5evVAeh+TpBoYz+6y3ZFEkPPPXnA00q7PbxVqpE3sBmV5QvDE0ucIZe TXUMx139360oUhke45wmKJmCp1H7gpDmGcCpTkRS/BS/ujTRAkY= =fMS6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq--