From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwEg7-0003yn-N8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:43:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwEg2-0005IH-LG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:43:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwEg2-0005I8-Gq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwEg2-0004ek-9M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:43:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28579] gpa Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:42:00 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170924214200.tssj45xcmo2nxdpx@abyayala> References: <20170924155452.lsq7mbnbuwa6clei@abyayala> <87fubc5ayl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20170924164556.jkqzdlnoqqdvdqbu@abyayala> <87377b6c3z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3tkeypfkin7ezadn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87377b6c3z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 28579@debbugs.gnu.org --3tkeypfkin7ezadn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicolas Goaziou transcribed 0.5K bytes: > ng0 writes: >=20 > > Why? It is a definition being used. > > Although I have to admit it looks unusual compared to the rest of the > > file. >=20 > It is a package name. By that rule, every package name is a definition, > since you "define" it in the description. It doesn't sound right to put > @dfn in every description, including this one, IMO. >=20 > Obviously, I'm nitpicking here. Ok, I agree. If no one commits this in the next 12 hours I'll send an update removing the @dfn{}, > > Thanks for finding the mistakes. Correction appended. >=20 > Thank you. >=20 > FWIW, I have no other comment about your patch. >=20 > Regards, >=20 --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://www.krosos.org --3tkeypfkin7ezadn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlnIJqcACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYh94w/+NDQ/b0dYpt9ywNDwU9d4FiaCnzVcybBz0l06qWNz/CuMf0a6+ftDWD43 wP1yDWtBhUxf35h2p5wL7XnQ5ZjVlhiuza3pR0YPguudmFQFZK5ESaSH67qe5XKi R03VYxWHUQC/3558qSkTFOnbxjuKd3GdiOg7ik24JaY/U1RaHwgjT08ZPHgwkrZW mejKURug+oFhuPJTcpLL8vmL16xT50x4gxeF+/cK2U9ZGjp8ZABAGHyj7VDHSJgc riC6a7MFP3UGhnyGY9Fdx/e7Tt43ddf+uxPaZSiK1LniyRLagzIPPXrq4uvvTFPr Rj3wXFvRvIuiRaOODXn4otnnBrmSwdnTJd70hJ1nOJlWRknb1E6063XIbfdVTy22 YOKBCj9N7UGKC+pP+5XrT608B47LuW67ufV1hkvlMoShGJQ1L2w8QXl4AWbAFiF1 HHjqdcv/J6CuyXTDUw01wnPwlZ4V11l5X6gYFKd1z11kdRBMLVDootpImrT/TtMn P2Cv9IpbLcEoReeyDaQK4qKToOnSB0V6KlnkaVYusHJFTGui3BxHhXIGK2fr3+m8 XA4aHb57tPoPcv4xp5Br1QCK/SGEyENc4fSA07/lNwK7OR2rHV9MMhQf6l+MXoRB keHpUvcOtSWMbTR2rmSuCtQ8iXeZIkL741d+knnKBJmQVWpw7Qc= =dD+x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3tkeypfkin7ezadn--