From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnXJn-000241-7I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:48:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnXJi-00042I-8m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:48:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnXJi-00042C-50 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnXJh-0003co-Tv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:48:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#28288] [PATCH 2/2] WIP Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 22:47:28 +0100 From: Christopher Baines Message-ID: <20170831224728.59e79444@cbaines.net> In-Reply-To: <20170831150448.41b0f41e@scratchpost.org> References: <20170830062010.11902-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20170830062010.11902-2-mail@cbaines.net> <20170830073113.426bf8d3@cbaines.net> <20170830103800.09ea6e31@scratchpost.org> <20170830235647.1def024c@cbaines.net> <20170831150448.41b0f41e@scratchpost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/5h2thJwWoSCIuXAXK.H0XHA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 28288@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/5h2thJwWoSCIuXAXK.H0XHA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:04:48 +0200 Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:56:47 +0100 > Christopher Baines wrote: >=20 > > I've just been testing with the master branch, and with the changes > > I sent to this bug. Are there any changes on the wip-installer-2 > > that are not solely related to the installer =20 >=20 > No >=20 > >(which if I understand correctly is something more complicated than > >running guix system init). =20 >=20 > Yes Great, ok, good to know I haven't missed anything. I'll hopefully be able to make some time soonish to take a look at getting the ISO image in to a state where running guix system init from it works, unless someone beats me to it! --Sig_/5h2thJwWoSCIuXAXK.H0XHA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlmog/BfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xd8eQ//RhGH89BwqPRQCF8lenUNLiDL4sjWgfTGuYGneJneMWt9vqSVr6sj6yVw e0F1QmVgSDyfdIbHw6rs/h78WWC2ETMLMdMwpsddka5HjR13Tis+pNS9Jvv++Wva OMQoHH80C6z6VoOnqGb/xVJMDWoO/cHYwmMCW4VHX6X9GGhj/Y7XtKHHHwr5eMl/ BfWnNnkZ4+Eb3Xh7DtGSZiqIbnEWZNU4UT6BCKonfc1cDk4Grb6eFO9xq+e4BPcC IuTQMUXgLkaxpIay6gGS6bLeseuAgXnQk5rp4EuaSrRnztwAOxmuxvX3FwM7edg9 Xtm7jmCIURHf3fotPgROQhxtVsdxSlcY6173ZJoWLPaIRrI+z2sYbtO7Ojk8lpvJ cGkMiWqiNvreQeCVhWeBjQNpZ3sZRzrzVyY9RwXg/UEwX4YICjqbpfM30AZPzSXW yngSgRvU0nuJTX7w81TZfNfuhZNu8+m9ZaS8Tz2Jl3Fk9iGywHJkvc/QV/sDoZwg e27cPN/9zeauH8uqHS9rjn32digRcXZHQkqOdNjPeBMIOX5c8v6bYn5JV3Hunb1b TdrTykGOXleZh1A+cveqAhD97cdc0llMtNjwyksdNzbUr4563oxokl1nh/evBsbC nkMKF/hG3iqqlYH4Q0Xxfq85FdfXOY3NJ0AUzLV+03t65OseB68= =LqV3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5h2thJwWoSCIuXAXK.H0XHA--