all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* git cannot be built
@ 2017-08-07 15:53 Ricardo Wurmus
  2017-08-07 16:35 ` ng0
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2017-08-07 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: guix-devel

Hi Guix,

Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
fail.

This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.

I cannot provide any more details about the test failure, I’m afraid,
because I didn’t keep the output (and it would take me too long to
reproduce the failure on my machine).

--
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-07 15:53 git cannot be built Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2017-08-07 16:35 ` ng0
  2017-08-07 16:43 ` Leo Famulari
  2017-08-09  4:10 ` Mark H Weaver
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-08-07 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: guix-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2938 bytes --]

Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 0.5K bytes:
> Hi Guix,
> 
> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
> fail.
> 
> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.
> 
> I cannot provide any more details about the test failure, I’m afraid,
> because I didn’t keep the output (and it would take me too long to
> reproduce the failure on my machine).

Maybe it is not an reproducible failure?
I have seen someone else state this failure, but I have yet to experience it:

user@abyayala ~/src/guix/guix$ uname -a; git --version
Linux abyayala 4.12.4-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
git version 2.14.0

On a different host, x86_64 aswell, was able to build the 2.13.4 -> 2.14.x upgrade
with grafts, and also with '--fallback --check --no-grafts':

[shadownet] 4:09pm ~ > uname -a; git --version
Linux shadownet 4.12.4-gnu #1 SMP 1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
git version 2.13.4

phase `strip' succeeded after 0.3 seconds
starting phase `validate-runpath'
validating RUNPATH of 0 binaries in "/gnu/store/ndmw78axip8l7ahgf1nb9xhr5li37ljx-git-2.14.0/lib"...
validating RUNPATH of 16 binaries in "/gnu/store/ndmw78axip8l7ahgf1nb9xhr5li37ljx-git-2.14.0/libexec"...
validating RUNPATH of 3 binaries in "/gnu/store/ndmw78axip8l7ahgf1nb9xhr5li37ljx-git-2.14.0/bin"...
validating RUNPATH of 0 binaries in "/gnu/store/pp36ci7ksvn91lc35vcxm35snkz5m6k1-git-2.14.0-send-email/libexec"...
validating RUNPATH of 0 binaries in "/gnu/store/6biqm41v909qn3l5rmhf5zm11ljhkqys-git-2.14.0-svn/libexec"...
validating RUNPATH of 0 binaries in "/gnu/store/9yvdh59jp0sswdmjnxqfrpi0svqmssc5-git-2.14.0-gui/libexec"...
validating RUNPATH of 0 binaries in "/gnu/store/9yvdh59jp0sswdmjnxqfrpi0svqmssc5-git-2.14.0-gui/bin"...
phase `validate-runpath' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
starting phase `validate-documentation-location'
phase `validate-documentation-location' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `delete-info-dir-file'
phase `delete-info-dir-file' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `patch-dot-desktop-files'
phase `patch-dot-desktop-files' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `reset-gzip-timestamps'
phase `reset-gzip-timestamps' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `compress-documentation'
compressing documentation in '/gnu/store/ndmw78axip8l7ahgf1nb9xhr5li37ljx-git-2.14.0/share/man' with "gzip" and flags ("--best" "--no-name")
phase `compress-documentation' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
/gnu/store/9yvdh59jp0sswdmjnxqfrpi0svqmssc5-git-2.14.0-gui
/gnu/store/ndmw78axip8l7ahgf1nb9xhr5li37ljx-git-2.14.0
/gnu/store/pp36ci7ksvn91lc35vcxm35snkz5m6k1-git-2.14.0-send-email
/gnu/store/6biqm41v909qn3l5rmhf5zm11ljhkqys-git-2.14.0-svn


-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-07 15:53 git cannot be built Ricardo Wurmus
  2017-08-07 16:35 ` ng0
@ 2017-08-07 16:43 ` Leo Famulari
  2017-08-09  4:10 ` Mark H Weaver
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-08-07 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: guix-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 672 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Guix,
> 
> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
> fail.
> 
> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.
> 
> I cannot provide any more details about the test failure, I’m afraid,
> because I didn’t keep the output (and it would take me too long to
> reproduce the failure on my machine).

I was able to build Git 2.14.0 on a foreign distro from commit
57e96e48b199705d0fda8f0060b4349e003d29d6, so I'm attaching my
build log in case it helps with debugging.

[-- Attachment #1.2: kc5p7pxmw7mbc08qvcj7v8q93g4mxq-git-2.14.0.drv.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 190182 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-07 15:53 git cannot be built Ricardo Wurmus
  2017-08-07 16:35 ` ng0
  2017-08-07 16:43 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2017-08-09  4:10 ` Mark H Weaver
  2017-08-09  8:02   ` Ricardo Wurmus
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2017-08-09  4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: guix-devel

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
> fail.
>
> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.

FWIW, it built successfully on my x86_64 GuixSD system.  I've
transitioned to building everything locally.

     Mark

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-09  4:10 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2017-08-09  8:02   ` Ricardo Wurmus
  2017-08-09 11:29     ` Ben Woodcroft
  2017-08-09 19:44     ` Mark H Weaver
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Wurmus @ 2017-08-09  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guix-devel


Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
>> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
>> fail.
>>
>> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.
>
> FWIW, it built successfully on my x86_64 GuixSD system.  I've
> transitioned to building everything locally.

It also worked on my i686 machine, but it failed repeatedly on my x200s.

--
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-09  8:02   ` Ricardo Wurmus
@ 2017-08-09 11:29     ` Ben Woodcroft
  2017-08-09 19:44     ` Mark H Weaver
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ben Woodcroft @ 2017-08-09 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Wurmus, Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guix-devel



On 09/08/17 18:02, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
>>> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
>>> fail.
>>>
>>> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.
>> FWIW, it built successfully on my x86_64 GuixSD system.  I've
>> transitioned to building everything locally.
> It also worked on my i686 machine, but it failed repeatedly on my x200s.
I also observed the tests failing on x86_64, but can now no longer 
reproduce, before or after the version update in 
7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f.

ben

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-09  8:02   ` Ricardo Wurmus
  2017-08-09 11:29     ` Ben Woodcroft
@ 2017-08-09 19:44     ` Mark H Weaver
  2017-08-09 20:10       ` Leo Famulari
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2017-08-09 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ricardo Wurmus; +Cc: guix-devel

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
>>> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
>>> fail.
>>>
>>> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.
>>
>> FWIW, it built successfully on my x86_64 GuixSD system.  I've
>> transitioned to building everything locally.
>
> It also worked on my i686 machine, but it failed repeatedly on my x200s.

I built it on a Thinkpad X200.  Perhaps I got lucky.  Also, it case it's
relevant, I've been using linux-libre@4.9 with selected patches from
Debian.

      Mark

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: git cannot be built
  2017-08-09 19:44     ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2017-08-09 20:10       ` Leo Famulari
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-08-09 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guix-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 977 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 03:44:23PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> 
> > Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
> >
> >> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
> >>
> >>> Commit 7f171fdaadb15bb1b313b25e9be3d1988b0f650f broke git for me.  I
> >>> cannot build it from source because one of the many tests appears to
> >>> fail.
> >>>
> >>> This is on x86_64.  I have not tried this on other architectures.
> >>
> >> FWIW, it built successfully on my x86_64 GuixSD system.  I've
> >> transitioned to building everything locally.
> >
> > It also worked on my i686 machine, but it failed repeatedly on my x200s.
> 
> I built it on a Thinkpad X200.  Perhaps I got lucky.  Also, it case it's
> relevant, I've been using linux-libre@4.9 with selected patches from
> Debian.

Anecdata: It failed once on my Debian x230, which is using the 4.12
kernel series (compiled myself). It's passed three times since then.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-09 20:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-08-07 15:53 git cannot be built Ricardo Wurmus
2017-08-07 16:35 ` ng0
2017-08-07 16:43 ` Leo Famulari
2017-08-09  4:10 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-08-09  8:02   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2017-08-09 11:29     ` Ben Woodcroft
2017-08-09 19:44     ` Mark H Weaver
2017-08-09 20:10       ` Leo Famulari

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.