From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dd2O2-0001KG-1q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:45:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dd2Ny-0006uR-Qm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:45:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dd2Ny-0006uL-N5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dd2Ny-0007P7-HU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:45:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27898] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Put autoconf-related phases immediately after the 'unpack phase. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 18:44:16 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170802224416.GB14798@jasmine.lan> References: <20170801072153.19077-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <20170801072153.19077-2-kei@openmailbox.org> <87k22lwys2.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170802194515.GC13105@jasmine.lan> <87k22l4sqb.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k22l4sqb.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: 27898@debbugs.gnu.org --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:31:08PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > I guess there is a correct ordering and an incorrect ordering, depending > > on whether or not these phases should happen before or after the shebang > > patching phases. Does it work if it happens before the shebangs are > > patched? >=20 > What does the "it" in "does it work" mean here? If you mean the > builds themselves, then no. Success isn't guaranteed because the > configure scripts might not be patched, as the patching phases are > finished before the "build" phases. This change ensures that the > "patch-usr-bin-file" phase can operate on generated configure scripts if > necessary: >=20 > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-07/msg00124.html I'm sorry for sending that confusing sentence! You interpreted it correctly. Thank for the clarification! --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmCVb8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgGSxAArHhdae/7yFB1Imz6NlI9iiLh0+9bLzTYwRTSs+bC3JaAN7VVm/uybzlz Uowgi4n7Gz/strtSFVtNc5hKfiW46Xin5nI0BNHYYc/KB8TnA2DgqFoTV/UJN290 j2KUVzYf8SAxhGOTaKNGm8sDJFtOnATNmf9whQEwLrFgmi6x2/alDMQ1O33RyLAw z7AhZnSjkBcnRnNHp677DjafOW5zVR3UJIeYn90IWbEV/BgEvt6DxzexEf1XrFJQ 9IVVKHZefNbwXb9b9g8eXLPE4lSpsrXHN3yqxqeR/RKPqpDAss7W8psmOps3n9oz mhjuIzs0gecV/cwvMZQVWQtgbdLyze4etN4zAgEU4GlWRSqB8/MezJhkE9hgdvsG KwUkOg2n3xx1AUBjMrRbERlR3UDnOoANeA4aH1YskAmDfJEa2jN0/Ju34QTq4JML MMpVFY+UaE07qKFOcPIhshGgIgqALrT6L+0SdClE/NuxeeJWDnPrb2d0dmNeqOrY nhAN9Ad4DpDriNSmEazUnFaSgEfuSgGADOcg6RuwW4pWhMN6E0KqijLDdcjyZHPj 0q+XLku/Pr65NzRPWxbX2z5GyvttNatTsYWfEkWJMRkFCzhf8K664pmO4OVgTWu1 deMZWzo8I/N4HTTjXqJNWmGaKX/HYo+R/+TZDbr3aM/No3eQafM= =2b3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--