From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdpk-0001mP-Sn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:32:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdpi-0003Zg-Ai for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:32:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdpi-0003ZZ-78 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdpi-0002E3-1w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:32:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27893] [PATCH] gnu: julia: Work around some test failures related to libgit2. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:31:40 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170801203140.GA7468@jasmine.lan> References: <3460381662f16e6d267a21c7d2f83a9cea216b6e.1501546450.git.leo@famulari.name> <87379bsjqz.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87379bsjqz.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27893@debbugs.gnu.org --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:46:44AM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > Leo Famulari skribis: >=20 > > * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (libgit2-0.25): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/julia.scm (julia)[inputs]: Replace LIBGIT2 with LIBGIT2-= 0.25. > > * gnu/packages/patches/libgit2-use-after-free.patch: New file. > > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. >=20 > Sorry for not noticing the breakage! I wonder if it would be > easier/safer to fix Julia than to keep the old libgit2. >=20 > Does this upstream commit fix the failures that you saw? The context of this patch actually doesn't exist in the Julia release. Based on the very large number of changes to this test between releases, my impression is that Julia is just not ready for libgit2 0.26.0, even though there are some commits addressing libgit2 0.26.0 in Julia. The thing is, I found this test failure building locally but on Hydra there are different failures [0]. So, even if we fix this issue, we still probably won't be offering a Julia substitute. Thus, I don't mind carrying this libgit2-0.25 package privately for now. [0] Has anyone got the Julia test suite to pass at all? Spill the beans! :) --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlmA5SgACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiaQg//RG4EieO47GzC8maj0V0O0Ic/dEGQZjXYfFRiPFVzIyiv/Na8GumK0FLV 7dxvsLBaFJPeAUSmPrXVVPn49f8amJ4Wy2o8As2cZxO6DeBej27ew6+B2dLhOKcR fuRxnlS1txvdR/VfUNccnmFDYqYPJ1DMBbi8EUxZUKzcJnOKHZsIvT4KrUgoMPS+ +gdoG8SbP6aBn/T7U7b3tMbyAkdnAw5yFiF8pzk/LCtHyFUwgAf4DYgHtO6fMWwn e8mEbDBBCJzrjElQMOOinox00511vXTf0SQIPOBN/kyU09fjQ0C/viHLQX1zOPO0 D/BBBUQLvLpRdfrsWS/nNLbGak8s/qxh4VV/c5HOKwMYAnX3SueaR5px2sTUxHZS KrsfHNHTNJ78I7/b2S6+SsU5cRom+j+pOze84SgupxWttU656ANIsbhxXac4thpc +Ch2aknrfmT8c6RxWP5BGLC0mXAgYKRA9ezWufHzScjkYjO0QwnjXP1NhZ2oCGgw B3IarU7ifOn2HkswNGyDbNDgFux3ITQMAuApf3Sz5ORiod76rvZodjaetjNZXo5b RNl4F/T67eYZ/n5aFoECqGat1o9BqLYPYQJ3Ipg8NuDBuW2U65KGdtRAGhJ++UHD RkV9nOVWpOQ2zrm9C1KRcP+PAR2DpdR9VZ7owVgUrluLYgYAZdU= =S10v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--