From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdWR-00078m-TS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:12:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdWM-000672-Tn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:12:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdWM-00066g-QQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:12:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcdWM-0001kK-Kw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:12:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27909] Replace keepassx with keepassxc Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 23:11:50 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <20170801201150.GQ2406@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <20170801150815.GJ2406@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170801194319.GA31810@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="o3Y+93sjbn8Tp8J9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170801194319.GA31810@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27909@debbugs.gnu.org --o3Y+93sjbn8Tp8J9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:43:19PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 06:08:16PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > The original keepassx hasn't seen much activity in quite a while, no > > bugs fixed or features added. Keepassxc is the community fork of > > keepassx. >=20 > The last keepassx release was in October 2016. That's not *that* long > unless there are some serious bugs in the program. >=20 The maintainer is MIA. I'm not aware of serious bugs, other than it still relying on Qt-4. > Are other distros replacing keepassx? >=20 I don't believe Debian is, but there is active work on packaging keepassxc. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D855173 > Is keepassxc a "seamless" replacement for keepassx, or would users maybe > have to adjust somehow? It is supposed to be a seamless replacement, using the same .kdbx files as keepassx. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --o3Y+93sjbn8Tp8J9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlmA4IYACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GdSw/9FliNBpmzeW+RWVGcqZG693AFbYQvMJXWYw1GbZ4ItWSmtYW8i4qkkjFu CY2aL5Ad33olrfm+lyGWhMX4gQHF8VXOeYFlFyyRcb/WXDmNuO116yOSqFqih6Ls Ias6quUF/5rwkeI8DF90SQUXCU5toC+nn5srSMOlaHDduyNDSZmuYHZbMOMdq+cD 9niz9EHxyR0S6pKdTpgW8k+4AT3vKe+Duy7xW3iGaI0QGaxPbVrs7xoG5ytO8zbA sgGBvH8lnRmlaCDkm+LdfalPrLWAwvqtxEbL4cWcgNz1njKK3YSLP/3zbygLptG7 zOL/nY9fQGg+2tTt5boyDZbJMQxaPA0t8wRTE8XYxQgjNyxZmwbBdxLxSQYLrYwj fPc5rDg6AIJRMl3gQccunVo29zlqNuyp+kHTi9a6tDDuU0iVQsPOX67Sur5kQtTr L0oGKc59ndAkPSgyLscy77H40y/er2yqrUxoDuEFphNXs2EL1pwxlFPJerzDbnKO nLWnOstbycMUHinMB5oVuEknBf60OGDi727fQns8dfaHRGTm9T122/skK/d7JCM9 +BH6/SCd29F5tprOcGWNJFXyu2O3x1f0/bVQA5U6wINk76fJmVSHwE00nWaJ5/Ue eecIgakTLTNIMwY8UmHAgTIktT3CXapBWrR03JYUewwksIHgvIo= =PviQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --o3Y+93sjbn8Tp8J9--