* tor with --expensive-hardening is using way too much memory
@ 2017-07-19 23:05 ng0
2017-07-20 2:11 ` Kei Kebreau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-07-19 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1706 bytes --]
I noticed this before the contribution entered master, so this message
is not really a news.
To quote myself from earlier today:
<ng0> I think we should revert one piece of the tor hardened build.. 3 hours
uptime: 684.3 MiB + 753.0 KiB = 685.1 MiB tor
Comparison: my Chromium with 55 tabs open uses 2.2GB.
Private + Shared = RAM used Program
…
12.4 MiB + 1.1 MiB = 13.4 MiB vim
15.5 MiB + 959.0 KiB = 16.4 MiB Xorg
17.3 MiB + 5.6 MiB = 22.9 MiB guix substitute
22.8 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 24.1 MiB shepherd
26.7 MiB + 551.5 KiB = 27.3 MiB emacs-25.2
131.1 MiB + 6.2 MiB = 137.3 MiB .guix-real
732.7 MiB + 932.0 KiB = 733.6 MiB tor
…
uptime: 6:24h
Now I wouldn't consider tor to be problematic when this would be the
default for tor. But it isn't, and --enable-expensive-hardening is an
experimental function which is not enabled by default from upstream (as
all our recently added config options for tor (not sure right now if all
are experimental, but they are not standard).
Comparison, Debian running for a very long time (months) and using the
same config:
40.6 MiB + 486.0 KiB = 41.1 MiB tor
I'm convinced that removing --enable-expensive-hardening will improve
the situation, I have watched an VM with tor without this config switch.
Whoever needs or wants this switch can make use of the easy way to
create custom packages in Guix.
If someone else can confirm my observations, I'll prepare an patch.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: tor with --expensive-hardening is using way too much memory
2017-07-19 23:05 tor with --expensive-hardening is using way too much memory ng0
@ 2017-07-20 2:11 ` Kei Kebreau
2017-07-29 17:19 ` ng0
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kei Kebreau @ 2017-07-20 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1823 bytes --]
ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> writes:
> I noticed this before the contribution entered master, so this message
> is not really a news.
>
> To quote myself from earlier today:
>
> <ng0> I think we should revert one piece of the tor hardened build.. 3 hours
> uptime: 684.3 MiB + 753.0 KiB = 685.1 MiB tor
>
> Comparison: my Chromium with 55 tabs open uses 2.2GB.
>
> Private + Shared = RAM used Program
> …
> 12.4 MiB + 1.1 MiB = 13.4 MiB vim
> 15.5 MiB + 959.0 KiB = 16.4 MiB Xorg
> 17.3 MiB + 5.6 MiB = 22.9 MiB guix substitute
> 22.8 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 24.1 MiB shepherd
> 26.7 MiB + 551.5 KiB = 27.3 MiB emacs-25.2
> 131.1 MiB + 6.2 MiB = 137.3 MiB .guix-real
> 732.7 MiB + 932.0 KiB = 733.6 MiB tor
> …
> uptime: 6:24h
>
> Now I wouldn't consider tor to be problematic when this would be the
> default for tor. But it isn't, and --enable-expensive-hardening is an
> experimental function which is not enabled by default from upstream (as
> all our recently added config options for tor (not sure right now if all
> are experimental, but they are not standard).
>
> Comparison, Debian running for a very long time (months) and using the
> same config:
>
> 40.6 MiB + 486.0 KiB = 41.1 MiB tor
>
>
> I'm convinced that removing --enable-expensive-hardening will improve
> the situation, I have watched an VM with tor without this config switch.
> Whoever needs or wants this switch can make use of the easy way to
> create custom packages in Guix.
>
> If someone else can confirm my observations, I'll prepare an patch.
The top(1) command tells me that tor is taking up just short of a
gigabyte of RAM. I haven't tried disabling the --enable-expensive-hardening
flag, yet.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: tor with --expensive-hardening is using way too much memory
2017-07-20 2:11 ` Kei Kebreau
@ 2017-07-29 17:19 ` ng0
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-07-29 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kei Kebreau; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2221 bytes --]
I will prepare a patch and open a new bug at guix-patches, I see no one
in favor of keeping it the way it is.
Kei Kebreau transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> writes:
>
> > I noticed this before the contribution entered master, so this message
> > is not really a news.
> >
> > To quote myself from earlier today:
> >
> > <ng0> I think we should revert one piece of the tor hardened build.. 3 hours
> > uptime: 684.3 MiB + 753.0 KiB = 685.1 MiB tor
> >
> > Comparison: my Chromium with 55 tabs open uses 2.2GB.
> >
> > Private + Shared = RAM used Program
> > …
> > 12.4 MiB + 1.1 MiB = 13.4 MiB vim
> > 15.5 MiB + 959.0 KiB = 16.4 MiB Xorg
> > 17.3 MiB + 5.6 MiB = 22.9 MiB guix substitute
> > 22.8 MiB + 1.3 MiB = 24.1 MiB shepherd
> > 26.7 MiB + 551.5 KiB = 27.3 MiB emacs-25.2
> > 131.1 MiB + 6.2 MiB = 137.3 MiB .guix-real
> > 732.7 MiB + 932.0 KiB = 733.6 MiB tor
> > …
> > uptime: 6:24h
> >
> > Now I wouldn't consider tor to be problematic when this would be the
> > default for tor. But it isn't, and --enable-expensive-hardening is an
> > experimental function which is not enabled by default from upstream (as
> > all our recently added config options for tor (not sure right now if all
> > are experimental, but they are not standard).
> >
> > Comparison, Debian running for a very long time (months) and using the
> > same config:
> >
> > 40.6 MiB + 486.0 KiB = 41.1 MiB tor
> >
> >
> > I'm convinced that removing --enable-expensive-hardening will improve
> > the situation, I have watched an VM with tor without this config switch.
> > Whoever needs or wants this switch can make use of the easy way to
> > create custom packages in Guix.
> >
> > If someone else can confirm my observations, I'll prepare an patch.
>
> The top(1) command tells me that tor is taking up just short of a
> gigabyte of RAM. I haven't tried disabling the --enable-expensive-hardening
> flag, yet.
--
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-29 17:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-19 23:05 tor with --expensive-hardening is using way too much memory ng0
2017-07-20 2:11 ` Kei Kebreau
2017-07-29 17:19 ` ng0
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.