From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Is font-google-noto toooooo big as a font package? Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:50:29 +0000 Message-ID: <20170719225029.szwrdekfpchazw7z@abyayala> References: <87pod1z1id.fsf@163.com> <87r2xf5fck.fsf@gnu.org> <31124b25.a25c.15d50edf50d.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <87pocy12jy.fsf@gnu.org> <20170718124017.udjqs4m4fo7evyjt@abyayala> <87h8y8maep.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6m5hboh6t7c355wl" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXxoD-0006lb-AL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:51:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXxoC-00022c-DE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:51:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h8y8maep.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel , tumashu --6m5hboh6t7c355wl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.7K bytes: > ng0 skribis: >=20 > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.2K bytes: > >> Hello, > >>=20 > >> tumashu skribis: > >>=20 > >> > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split packag= e easy > >>=20 > >> Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split > >> it, which may not be that simple. > >>=20 > >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > >>=20 > >>=20 > > noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends: > > https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk > > noto itself is offered on the website in many different > > blends aswell: > > https://www.google.com/get/noto/ >=20 > So maybe we could make the CJK part a different output or a different > package? >=20 > Ludo=E2=80=99. >=20 >=20 Depending on how active the sources change (I see no version in the names of the files) we could take every part and move it to their own package, and let "google-font-noto" became a metapackage for those who need/want the entire set. Even cjk can be a meta set, as all the CJK fonts are split. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --6m5hboh6t7c355wl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAllv4jUACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgWAQ//S2MSRAiXm+WoCIJEG1UBOPFzuytsKPaB/ZbDLdJrx+ePcc7ipPt/DY4D ftjZ2qcS0zqW9nVTHyOauULwlAObE9EVx6KadyvjmCIQ+seU2AzPuutanmBU1V0l PbpWyJH0Nrx9zkTu4WQs4drIlz2p5M5gFWVko76e8VK1ooNskOUWNr7tx8RDWMGx jD4ZU5DW3XUpQ6XzD+/UUsjfkbCeyUsA1sMU/5/oKGPLOqaRNBjIJHLXR6zA5p2X ybh9vc9kXvNEyZsm3a/xaiIb9RIsshKUfZqofrPN3alnQ/2Tt8HeZ9z+5d2ERL5j HZqWNfuuMFsgTq0uLk+GvXxvInX/TT1r/CnhrKQqtcbvt82hVUq1eofLm5G3DeiR e06RdRRNZ6XOUUn1AyZV9YLwZRGAYY9o69rS1rfACVpAfxrsd9/2fS4wsj1rPFoC IKrltQdPFb2sQYJZCmI5y7M7UeyBCut/1kRTSFmbeFU789e6jzX5n8FZakJSbUae RATX1NQCgFQafhEIt98l/kji2iec2Hprgi0UKx6csZ6KyOCVh/3K7f29XoXvxgpB aktbabnf6ku2BkeijYQ5uZeovW3U6mlWRAz0EgWLfK7Kcu3NA58/0+M52XmLgqYW 1VKNP0nSlcZmcHdemViwyP/nK6RtfFejFaoN3YLdcf5KxtUbLsE= =hi2t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6m5hboh6t7c355wl--