From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Is font-google-noto toooooo big as a font package? Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 12:43:52 +0000 Message-ID: <20170718124352.zdcfijocbyyssfds@abyayala> References: <87pod1z1id.fsf@163.com> <87r2xf5fck.fsf@gnu.org> <31124b25.a25c.15d50edf50d.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <87pocy12jy.fsf@gnu.org> <20170718124017.udjqs4m4fo7evyjt@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ocvehzf7nmapf2zc" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXRrG-00008J-AM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:44:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXRrF-0006dt-9p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:44:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170718124017.udjqs4m4fo7evyjt@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , tumashu , guix-devel --ocvehzf7nmapf2zc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 transcribed 1.9K bytes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s transcribed 0.2K bytes: > > Hello, > >=20 > > tumashu skribis: > >=20 > > > the first thing is improve font-build-system to support split package= easy > >=20 > > Good point, though I think we also need to find out how we would split > > it, which may not be that simple. > >=20 > > Ludo=E2=80=99. > >=20 > >=20 > noto-cjk is offered in different packages and blends: > https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/cjk > noto itself is offered on the website in many different > blends aswell: > https://www.google.com/get/noto/ >=20 > By the way, this is totally unversioned. Is our only way > to know that noto has been updated by our package reporting > a hash missmatch? Looks to me like it is. > Should we store the fonts somewhere versioned as a fallback? For noto-cjk debian has some notes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D862276 --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://n0is.noblogs.org/my-keys https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org --ocvehzf7nmapf2zc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlluAogACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYjhZg//XL/jQqACNYBiaikBK5ihfDrXGZr4Ap0qQq750ITL6TNYiqmc3BbdboBP 9KNOCH6H7b3d65ghEm74Ymr+SyakUX3l2uLfkLWz4sZ1UJ7u0BZR9zt96ZaxU9eZ kJJoNhSUG4Wleo5SiggAISmy8046xlrJilUca6rHz126mq3j55mwuYz+nQO9XcB/ DAydb/AbS2YUA3o2j8pyus2E2sCVjea+gwwL8mdmA1u5IyLTIpoEfCuLkzyeX1EB tEqRlALVEgW7jckNm/MwnceBox+uBv/H2+NYHV10W0ImJu0ViMlbSDHRmHkRtuLk 9lgxBen/4ghZ2H50H4/9b6XPi9oxMiFqljeuSw0+wEhw9tGD7fSlssuvsNkfz4Ii UvfIZyydRWEYpWDwET3nDpz0QZqt1+6oBDKTJB2QsHBqV0iOzfLVTTY9Hw6lRkVy twYFZ/9qnz8C4G+m3HUmnSmxtTgqFB7bkOVKOv6I0AtUDhkoKP0t9OVFgIatQGhB /VT+JS8H2uPwStPLXFlpxXZGf5gMJTRAWXJX78O7Wg29zITwc/F17EzcGhiIapry Fza4vYT4yIRjY9Y5ne+HY6wV1JgsqwIRY7D/H+n0UR0ikEk4ldbB5Wy8rMktJkvo Y8JHKI3hOtXDfGc4fUIh+6LGS/KGOOrfbKyV38Ex9liYwbWDNSw= =cYN6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ocvehzf7nmapf2zc--