From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPFw-0003uB-2f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:56:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPFq-0003Jo-Fc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:56:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPFq-0003Jk-CW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:56:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dNPFq-00011g-5A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:56:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27428] [PATCH] gnu: gsl: Update to 2.4. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:55:38 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <20170620195538.GB2768@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <1a1bdf27.AEAALq4UWmUAAAAAAAAAAAOtUOAAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZSDbL@mailjet.com> <877f06ppcx.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27428@debbugs.gnu.org --eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 01:00:31AM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: >=20 > I am CCing Efraim. >=20 > Marius Bakke writes: >=20 > > Arun Isaac writes: > > > >> * gnu/packages/maths.scm (gsl): Update to 2.4. > > > > This should also mention that #:parallel-tests? is now gone. > > > > [...] > > > >> I don't know if this section is still valid. I don't have machines > >> with these architectures. How do I check? > > > > Digging around in the ChangeLog might give some hints. If nothing is > > mentioned, I would just assume the status quo. > > > > For aarch64 in particular, I suppose you could ping Efraim on IRC. >=20 =46rom digging around gsl's bug reports it looked like the devs there don't have access to some of those machines either, or access to enough of them to make sure the code works on different hardware. Unfortunately it still fails on my machine, with the first failure still on the linalg directory. Its on my things to do list to try to fix some of the tests but I haven't gotten around to it yet. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAllJfbAACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1EnKxAAoPr3xrnt0ko6x5lDNiH9Cze98CFozbmwT3ZpBlMQFNsdu7mCVu0DsmXo ZF5+R6iTsItlxYMLJDr+sodxoRiWYxaBKyYWaFI100XRk1GxFWC6yhpmYeuEDbaJ 5u+nHD+HpPhisHbQ8HdYhEaCRM7b6fQAgBFfor7LRAN4eiUsg0fM1z8f1Mf/h9dd F4CEx/xJNCx65D/hRSWFvoo/E6Y+N8d2vGgPs9b6cpBvvPnzXu7JY1RmcyIwhhGH jx4hCKIjRJTqQYHsgNXgbAti2IKjfgouQEwB/Qf81i3h8zUySyV/nW+6yOguuMT3 YIBmjCHBkWVsKVUf+fxa7LcdUUdRuSrjcdDI3WVJkf8pbL8Kf/N2FJxLRaStcjpT 1jlKzl8aKMY7Z8+2RwYnDIvYxK3bDIPgHHyWXwfSc5RfFIuhEit7QiqoOk18ypX0 u4LHsgLWxKRYKFGCAkWTZmkhgwsb/arkrMWVF+vQTjadsPMg+BpBgEWOwXEMmrZp 6GLpsWIteP4GoR3r6zbGVKgq66TEie3L8SEN7qng4TTEAh1rBr3mP+K3sJvZ1gce hfeXlL1+qA1Wjnq3T5SY0Y+up7ODrx3WS2E0Xvo7gYO5mIMn0P665GknxrURpRoM jbH13zPp1zQc7LGiULaM9DHUOlOipMzo8AjKVZ3w3Rf+cvthWMQ= =S37n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ--