From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#27284: Memory leak in 'guix pull' or 'make' in guix source Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:02:04 +0000 Message-ID: <20170608150204.zxutyffvwyktymfa@abyayala> References: <20170608083935.izw747zaetkaxv4o@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6gl4womnsft25osc" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIyxl-0002Mh-Lm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:03:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIyxi-0007xM-HG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:03:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIyxi-0007wy-DE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dIyxi-0000Iq-1O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:03:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170608083935.izw747zaetkaxv4o@abyayala> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 27284@debbugs.gnu.org --6gl4womnsft25osc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 transcribed 1.6K bytes: > This has been discussed on IRC and on guix-devel mailinglist > but so far I haven't seen a formal bug report to make this > visible. >=20 > I can't find the right threads or timestamps for this > bug, so take it as is and extend with facts. >=20 > At the moment of writing, guix pull has the minimum > requirement of 3 GB RAM. >=20 > Before this started, I was able to run Guix on as > little as 512MB RAM. >=20 > People are currently finding out about this bug > the hard way, so we should point this out. Didn't > really happen so I guess someone is working on this > already. For reference with more details: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2017-05/msg00033.html --=20 ng0 OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 --6gl4womnsft25osc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlk5ZuwACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgeIQ//QxquxPRolEFOCbs9b38L5IF1UHs5oEV2q11Gxo9fncG7rn4QBHEkZ2z/ bhSVN7sDuK0UVN+DosuLYusX8yKb6Ie25W3VMSw7+sF93tXS3rFb/RwFZQs8teFW IPPwVLB1SNmQbfTOjyEG44nWBnJfc9yXkBaLJHzs27Ut4T50517vmq8UDiTIrCCW QqOGCg2UPrLkaFUfTZDa0OUv+16mW4CFjhffGopVjj3+x8VcpXuJUJikIPJt+7rQ YFz1gvpHbRGpc7Jold02++tfcoolGBwyUjStR+HsnNoKQ5r9vC6nFHF7gPakS/nQ k5js393W+l2S53+6j5Ax13Eyduaug7xjM67R4V5KAIa20l4raq6h1P0U/yP88J8e 3iHzs+pTsVSwskhdGTxKlQ5sGZnH0MYrunMlO9rxMoUBUS4ALiBEv+pysdnGkwpZ IIuARwTZ/G7NnLli+p67Ik9HiSZTXkFsNjumSFajwFwmVJ4UEszV7YEatxPaK+Cv YvULYcgdWEkvtsNZ9pgz+KMb4sSpabTslzmDgqWhGRSgyVRwxy0O0tPS9DUaIho9 Nbb8rBPVCXcaNI11Bkh+8vuEzir8fg35qIxrefGBAmccndUiZrCiqFevh/GnSJ1C RvjtOYbww8nGtC24QdYCof1d9YZy5sAsJR8J1LwSgW4/uHUt8aE= =RPBA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6gl4womnsft25osc--