From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHb4J-0004S3-BF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 15:20:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHb4G-0006X0-7K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 15:20:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53452) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHb4E-0006VY-MW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 15:20:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHb4E-0006oS-D8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 15:20:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27227: [PATCH] gnu: perl: Update to 5.26.0. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 15:19:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170604191939.GB2840@jasmine> References: <87k24ryigh.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170604163721.GC14880@jasmine> <87inkbppmb.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87inkbppmb.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 27227-done@debbugs.gnu.org --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:35:56PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 03:45:50PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> Leo Famulari writes: > >>=20 > >> > * gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl): Update to 5.26.0. > >> > * gnu/packages/patches/perl-no-sys-dirs.patch: Update patch context = for > >> > 'hints/linux.sh'. > >>=20 > >> LGTM. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Is core-updates still open for changes like this? Or should I wait unti= l the > > next cycle? >=20 > Perl (and openldap) have not been built yet, so I think it's fine. I merged master into core-updates and pushed this as f65805485dac3f8c4586648e3f7e901202095a19. --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlk0XUsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgwyw//UHKOHi/fED1Hg2cwqUvzMYEgFo9wcc/yNm9X1r9m2WNahIXpGwqx0y9O bLfrCOqt9AXpkgCVN6b0ppcW3VjQxkm4W4HX/hClnZHkN6Dgx0SKjCGlRqnTmYdK iHjOY/Np6u5ezcCkVtKwgUROpS0VKichokZ6IYzDEV+qGR4I1f8Ld76tJO+oG6IP U8v1xTBCDo/Pdfp4gIpA80sFC8+fVGXy2ios19HhHaIHtB88MJM/3vi+nRCzbrsr h70FZy+EVSEchxY/kreeGZhl6HISyNUzlXZjbGRYgXfkV7sZ7KQ13Bpz3nXHmrYu WVJs0NjERnP4/ycB/5wWeYZlLA4Lhhy/NU/svvu/+m/i2pMmXxigEGxAAOHKdYG4 gvsmKiQvcMvym4U63Pdcia2czhKc1oY2iiCI4mafPT6WdGakbjb8Ek54fSG92opy CwxestKLhJOv4vvIMfwzgaRlMYm7gIFl3ZRt20c92zaenfihjT6olD6LYzNzxPrr ogZcM5uaH/PnM8qT/+OHU8JJsNK+PROjWk9nCrtHsTTnbgUfm69Z+kX5w8iPqj7m EfAh18+POzQdGBJ/yJkWBUPZ79aR6xNvY71Dwx6wAPgi7EBCUYAuucDqv50kvQxl 9K7UwemqBAmVxrUXRQ5iGvI6UH/2RLM/W41m+FwFIz4whD4ICKs= =oYH8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--