From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYYU-0002C7-SP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:39:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYYR-0000hI-Ki for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:39:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYYQ-0000gL-E2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:39:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dHYYQ-0007x8-98 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:39:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27220: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: openldap: Update to 2.4.45. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:37:57 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170604163757.GD14880@jasmine> References: <20170603212819.GA11817@jasmine> <87y3t7yj12.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y3t7yj12.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 27220@debbugs.gnu.org --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 03:33:29PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > * gnu/packages/openldap.scm (openldap): Update to 2.4.45. > > [replacement]: Remove field. > > [home-page], [source]: Use HTTPS URLs for home-page and the USA mirror. > > (openldap/fixed): Remove variable. > > * gnu/packages/patches/openldap-CVE-2017-9287.patch: Delete file. > > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it. >=20 > LGTM. Is core-updates open for these changes to OpenLDAP? Or should I wait until = the next cycle? --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlk0N2UACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiL/g//XueeT0GkJZ9ok3OXPS6os5Oqd8sk9B6Om63WGEfqaH5QeeROq6UgQ67M OnjPcjIdoVjsHq84DGo8WFVxtmAhFSCf7tOEeCrQpfTrk3PQey3VD5tG314DpHcv EvlhEPlg+T7SkgNHUgIZpaO3bTaKENumS7PE/lQEU9TUu7PDAgLk1GN4kFPLVDFQ agZ9v3kelzgiwErRmWF/Mg2J3wSXQeyq6UlbwKZMoXE+gSTDCkA97GyOwAY2Qp9s qn3xH3hpoaVLTDsrjygCsNXcNUvpQIAJEE502/Z2nq7bqPpLI0RUtVCWRlxYD3Bd KUhxWOzae4UsymU8UtX90C1lVd/h6uzB1qov3W6AJoWbDjzHbGoTVushnObKGob6 VwefUqU/O9HsM+yrsk10bvhNMcWHacAflfb2hNCL0ils/9PKwxIBq8q3m2dmr7tn Z7bWaxAw5U8TzpVL2QgciwHQqWCZDBSW+VmKnSq89pq3q1jP23TyEMs/lPgyCRJZ yHl3d+wNjzKAzKIHZkRpTscvDd9UqtjJZ9cChqNBWzSD6msRjkVOu67M/+fl8Npf H3dQCl0VdUdr/GV1tPTSj9vO23wS3H66eyEOTEPjdCwBlIXuSuq+daCMFpJFQVsH 6a6RRkR/x51l9DO+D0dMQRZZH6VpAnjzoZSGGGlBjp+ZLQLe+LI= =WbM3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--