all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Any objections to removing linux-libre@4.1?
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 12:31:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170604163130.GA14880@jasmine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wp8suvs4.fsf@netris.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1374 bytes --]

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 02:11:39AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix?  If not, I'd like
> to remove it.
> 
> Upstream security updates for it seem to be quite infrequent (2.5 months
> between the last two releases), and the recent update to 4.1.40
> neglected to include a fix for CVE-2017-6074, which does not inspire
> confidence.
> 
> What do you think?

I don't have a strong objection. If somebody needs this particular Linux release
series later, it will not be difficult for them to recreate.

On the other hand, the 4.1 series has been selected for the Linux Foundation's
Long Term Support Initiative. This program will support Linux releases for
longer than usual, so 4.1 will be in use for longer than most of the Linux LTS
releases.

Besides, kernel bugs are not rare. More will be found and disclosed, and some
will be found and kept private :/

I recommend waiting a few days for more comments. IIRC, we kept this particular
series to work around some bugs related to GuixSD and Libreboot. So, there were
some people using it. I'd hate to "strand" existing users who might not notice
that they are not receiving updates to the 'linux-4.1' package they've specified
in their GuixSD configuration.

If Hydra resources are a concern, perhaps we could keep the package but not
build it.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-04 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-04  6:11 Any objections to removing linux-libre@4.1? Mark H Weaver
2017-06-04 16:31 ` Leo Famulari [this message]
2017-06-04 19:54   ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-04 21:47   ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-05 21:46     ` Leo Famulari
2017-06-06  0:59       ` Mark H Weaver
2017-06-04 21:19 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-06-08 14:33 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2017-06-09 16:50   ` Mark H Weaver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170604163130.GA14880@jasmine \
    --to=leo@famulari.name \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=mhw@netris.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.