Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1187 bytes --]

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:50:13PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add Artifex Ghostscript.
> 
> * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (artifex-ghostscript): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/artifex-ghostscript-runpath.patch: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.

> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  (define-module (gnu packages ghostscript)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages autotools)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages base)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages compression)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages fontutils)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages image)
> @@ -31,6 +32,8 @@
>    #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages python)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages tcl)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages tls)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages xml)
>    #:use-module (gnu packages xorg)
>    #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:prefix license:)
>    #:use-module (guix packages)

Oops, this hunk is unecessary. It may be possible to add some
functionality by linking with libraries from these modules, but I'd
rather try to keep feature parity for the initial change to this new
source.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]