From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dF34n-0000AL-SO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 14:38:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dF34k-0008Fl-NO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 14:38:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dF34k-0008Fh-JG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 14:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dF34k-000560-DN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 14:38:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27110: [PATCH] gnu: asciinema: Update to 1.4.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 14:37:53 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170528183753.GB15883@jasmine> References: <1495934193.2882278.990671576.787F34D9@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1519f8c5.AEUAKk_HotIAAAAAAAAAAAPFk78AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKwI9@mailjet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1519f8c5.AEUAKk_HotIAAAAAAAAAAAPFk78AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKwI9@mailjet.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 27110@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Griffin --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:30:34PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: >=20 > Thanks for the patch! >=20 > > * gnu/packages/terminals.scm (asciinema): Update to 1.4.0. > > [source]: Use pypi-uri. >=20 > Could you switch to upstream's github release tarball instead? > https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema/archive/v1.4.0.tar.gz >=20 > LGTM, otherwise! Is there a reason to prefer one over the other? I ask because, typically, these unammed GitHub tarballs are not actual releases prepared by the maintainers, but just a snapshot of the Git repo, created automatically by GitHub for each tag. PyPi tends to contain the "real" release in cases like this. --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkrGQAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjXvRAA1FWTeybZbP+T5GtBN5flbvuOo9lZqhrFEcpMpvRKacYmvoyREms6Y+xK 4Hhva+qKOc4WtBC35vrcA8zP708EGacKEh4OdDXWXdiwxSe1/bTOnByrH+6SvRU/ VARtYcVzoq6PFCsq4lWTIjCcbmnUlhcBY6KHsJHwehNuvhlUGbpbWrBtIQWEeTGO rscUiqQtX0d9qinOZ/BPsiDI0eSjNRt72HBRnTIBZTTB5aHBIDMhMTQRurjHRuGr thxNrBTSYCNWQehnAY8iNyfx85u5ZcVt4EGvbJRuIB7ObIVoSBpEP3N0kypUMZsZ hzHt+BKHAu9g17WlB0EDMypxJMrFueHzRzUoH8+wTc0lS5mq3xfH5G3gQMMXWLnX kDeVpWNtkv0kPsCJsDm0LtyhMGa74WRJChWL0N1YM+Wqo65YXW5SBMmYTq+Blv/r BkeTUE61k2FDIlUIniGQq9gAgox95JnWTJ/HFHrWsE4uQqvhzQxAJh2uEGJOFJug /wjQhlbUyO8qEX88lLj9Lygixzi5qI++qih/y7HR+v/jn8/przqQ4KZ1RbS6pOvo 7MVkloLzpDpakM6v8UtLnv4mquAqAGMb7autKs9r9S/2KHF2Dhn0EriMxv7giYz+ mSE9iWF1LvAGy3wUJZlMR3RdP8EaDrrWT6NfoFvaGDANN+REpRY= =kEdw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/--