From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEILN-0002zZ-JO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 12:44:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEILK-0007vL-Ey for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 12:44:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEILK-0007vH-B3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 12:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEILK-0000i6-5g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 12:44:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27081: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add python-packaging. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 12:43:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170526164339.GB23676@jasmine> References: <20170526073852.GA19030@jasmine> <87inknu5jg.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87inknu5jg.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 27081@debbugs.gnu.org --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 03:11:15PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > +;;; From 'LICENSE': This software is made available under the terms of= *either* > > +;;; of the licenses found in LICENSE.APACHE or LICENSE.BSD. Contributi= ons to > > +;;; this software is made under the terms of *both* these licenses. >=20 > Please only use two semicolons here, with indentation. IMO the "triple > semicolons" are for "meta-commentary" about the module, not for code > comments. Okay, the Guile manual doesn't suggest this, but it seems fine. > Other than that looks good. As a side note, I typically don't append to > modules since the patch context quickly becomes outdated (like now), but > that's another issue entirely :-) That's my burden to bear in this case :) --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkoWzsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgqWA/+NIoLcOt3gpJO2asYesC5ZWMZ71oWrTXEFE4bWh1kEehXuScqUxWr3/RG eOXnM/1iFhyiCUpcgm5xEZ3/VCguWnh7Opg6OUbHBSIA4g6mxbZLVxMTJit5XGFq erKqmAJk3cXGTGuOZqb43fTeas0h5m+EVMBJJ1tuag+S+eAeu7oYRc7LCy+kmuci aM72F/FDF+KCJA3Xwh700+TgmFieIZBtgXZhxzd2GXeVEfzTBMfMK32YlkvoEGfo ZxOUWUGWsvrKq8sAm20XyfSvUSI2reBVHzt8+zLa1USBJXY0gltPeD5JkBn0CgTY LUWmXy8syZpVTlNolF6fggO8mBUtBh5fqghmJf0k3v6UM9464wnmFp7hMoCCxPen pOfdfeHrNXuqWvH7hCGlv6dVI/lNo0A3KUqEfl4Lo0KgLT3i3VwLMHy4BGCTLqLu P2Y/dMRV6X+dtVCm2yPdtN/92aNiPoV1LEMZscbH5aL8hD/ENWXe+0kVwlsvwkv0 L8XDn20/AdQijXoqVwQ2RRt9tD8iPbPmoxBOhz9i9hirW23V1kGftMZrjRPpEGFA kzIITlsOhjMPJL+hd2cgb6dCC43AKsVChI5hYJqXXlBcFC/prY1Qib0KdVmMVhTd zqbsufQjrcH2KfYpVuRHNTlAHSQ6R1O4xY17hR5nn414MQxBCfY= =qbT/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8P1HSweYDcXXzwPJ--