From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#27042: test-package.sh fails on aarch64 Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:09:23 +0300 Message-ID: <20170524070922.GM27114@macbook42.flashner.co.il> References: <20170523192521.GL27114@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <87y3tn70f5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDQQp-000770-EF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 03:10:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDQQk-0004Ko-EZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 03:10:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDQQk-0004Kc-C3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 03:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDQQj-0006l7-UP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 03:10:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y3tn70f5.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27042@debbugs.gnu.org --51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:01:18PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi Efraim, >=20 > Efraim Flashner skribis: >=20 > > On aarch64 the test 'test-package.sh' fails due to 'offload: command not > > found' >=20 > You mean tests/guix-package.sh, right? Could it be a misconfiguration, > like ./configure initially detected Guile-SSH (is > HAVE_DAEMON_OFFLOAD_HOOK defined in nix/config.h), but then, later on, > Guile-SSH became unavailable (removed, search path changed, etc.) and at > the time the test was run it was no longer there, so =E2=80=98guix offloa= d=E2=80=99 > failed. Something like that. >=20 > You can check that by building in a pristine tree: >=20 > make distclean > autoreconf -vfi > ./configure -C =E2=80=A6 > =E2=80=A6 >=20 > HTH, > Ludo=E2=80=99. I can test this, but it also happens with 'guix build guix', so it doesn't seem likely to me that this would make a difference. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEkVdB/rIvpOM7bo+N9MHTkX6s7pMFAlklMZUACgkQ9MHTkX6s 7pPtmRAAmjFhtcYfIIiHq923DgcjxsA4QpO/Ph9zDLe8rUPjNA44UsAjiHwL18C8 IXLJnmWxA2xqrG6J52m48+j3qmwnv+DqS71WLeiw7UC3tT1Wnn2pn89rAvi1+79G cyar9aanzvAHY8drZLX6M5+0vziV0GpCnoq2IK6E6+MJxYG0i2e31S7L+Fxks37t 3qJnujBJ6roSHmglw2Q7QcDYaImCsVcwuzZTxHu7X/tbAaxfZPblQmY3Sk7XaTKT S4ST8VqdwACX+xYeQ4KQJloGFXrvABH3ueC6uB+DsHqF+82Ni2N0jig1IZn2fOAQ ewlrVLuAC719tvMS505mu7wOO5bN7l20gTVfqiRDm+P9l6EKog1hHRxlON61sTYP xediD6n3YK1tmhLCkMa9qJR8XHCEfZKJtny90Kdeu1Dh2AfTfG294w5lD4bZda0q Wzz9AJeNjBKOVoCL1BErSH05F3YWaoCmPC3WRwFCOfW2ePXvBNPgy6VnTgGNieKz l5hbwB8LNiDUC45MbOZNWtlK18Zo8DYnCSjor2u8Qqeu/eS4xP8GuWi4sJh/uZfx 5Xb+Q6AnM3HWQeGvIo8tcf38QyNZnbKrhsXtEpVb9rHmScZdmwVXdfS4It7kNpCj Uzv3XJebUvHHlz/wVAuxcY++6dsV3+JCfxJpwgk2qTxuUBKHpo8= =8ccJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --51uid+Ur/3ko9cBW--