On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 03:06:41PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: > > Leo Famulari writes: > >> Both programs are distributed under the AGPL, as far as I can tell. But > >> Artifex Ghostscript is actively developed, which I think is very > >> important for C software that is designed to handle untrusted input. > > > > Thanks for bringing this up. GNU Ghostscript seemed to go > > mostly-inactive[0] after Artifex changed to AGPL in 2013[1]. The latest > > "upstream" release is 9.21[2], we have 9.14.0 (from 2014!). > > > > I'm in favor of switching to the active fork. > > Me too. In fact, I once tried to package Artifex Ghostscript, but > failed in the attempt to unbundle libraries. I'll try this in the next few days. If you still have your old attempt, I'd be happy to see it :)