bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[Vasile Dumitrascu]

* gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
* gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.
---
 gnu/packages/dns.scm | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/dns.scm b/gnu/packages/dns.scm
index c0279565d..871f034cb 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/dns.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/dns.scm
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
+;;; Copyright © 2017 Vasile Dumitrascu <va511e@yahoo.com>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
 ;;;
@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ and BOOTP/TFTP for network booting of diskless machines.")
 (define-public bind
   (package
     (name "bind")
-    (version "9.10.4-P8")
+    (version "9.11.1")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri (string-append
@@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ and BOOTP/TFTP for network booting of diskless machines.")
                     version ".tar.gz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "1sv6fp5gznjj1kmx9q8wr2c6js10wqckgy25sqj83bbf8smmdlvx"))))
+                "1chhphaa4lmfxj9daqsxph5ng4h3qq51jx21rj2i6an8ynah0192"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (outputs `("out" "utils"))
     (inputs
@@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ high-volume and high-reliability applications. The name BIND stands for
 \"Berkeley Internet Name Domain\", because the software originated in the early
 1980s at the University of California at Berkeley.")
     (home-page "https://www.isc.org/downloads/bind")
-    (license (list license:isc))))
+    (license (list license:mpl2.0))))
 
 (define-public dnscrypt-proxy
   (package
-- 
2.11.0

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 864 bytes --]

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote:
> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.

Thanks! I see that ISC recommends this release for production use,
although it is labeled "Early Deployment" instead of "Current-Stable".

You can see this production "endorsement" if you hover your mouse over
the "Early Deployment" text in the BIND tab:

https://www.isc.org/downloads/

Does anyone see a reason to stick to the 9.10 release series for now?
And, should we stick the 9.9 release series for isc-dhcp's bundled BIND
replacement?

> -    (license (list license:isc))))
> +    (license (list license:mpl2.0))))

In case anyone is wondering, ISC relicensed BIND to the MPL2.0 in BIND
9.11.0:

https://www.isc.org/blogs/bind9-adopts-the-mpl-2-0-license-with-bind-9-11-0/

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Leo,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.
>
> Thanks! I see that ISC recommends this release for production use,
> although it is labeled "Early Deployment" instead of "Current-Stable".
>
> You can see this production "endorsement" if you hover your mouse over
> the "Early Deployment" text in the BIND tab:
>
> https://www.isc.org/downloads/
>
> Does anyone see a reason to stick to the 9.10 release series for now?

I would trust ISC’s judgment on this and thus switch to 9.11.1.

> And, should we stick the 9.9 release series for isc-dhcp's bundled BIND
> replacement?

No idea what the implications would be!

Ludo’.

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 253 bytes --]

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote:
> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.

Thanks, Vasile! I pushed as ecc7aa893d80513e851ced164f09c34a7f919b3e.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[Vasile Dumitrascu]

Thank you for merging,

  Vasile

Leo Famulari:
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.
> 
> Thanks, Vasile! I pushed as ecc7aa893d80513e851ced164f09c34a7f919b3e.
> 

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[tumashu]

isrgrootx1.pem is a package?  



--
发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版


在 2017-05-05 21:38:00，"Vasile Dumitrascu" <va511e@yahoo.com> 写道：
>Thank you for merging,
>
>  Vasile
>
>Leo Famulari:
>> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote:
>>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1.
>>> * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0.
>> 
>> Thanks, Vasile! I pushed as ecc7aa893d80513e851ced164f09c34a7f919b3e.
>> 
>
>
>

bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1.

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 277 bytes --]

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:38:42PM +0800, tumashu wrote:
> 
> isrgrootx1.pem is a package?  

isrgrootx1.pem is th eroot certificate of the Let's Encrypt certificate
authority:

https://letsencrypt.org/certs/isrgrootx1.pem.txt

Why do you ask? Is it related to BIND?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]