From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5bfe-0002jf-Di for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 13:33:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5bfb-0001sa-7u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 13:33:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5bfa-0001rQ-60 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 13:33:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5bfZ-0006Gu-UD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 13:33:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26746: [PATCH] gnu: bind: Update to 9.11.1. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 13:32:34 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20170502173234.GB15523@jasmine> References: <20170502123428.17304-1-va511e@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170502123428.17304-1-va511e@yahoo.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vasile Dumitrascu Cc: 26746@debbugs.gnu.org --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +0200, Vasile Dumitrascu wrote: > * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind): Update to 9.11.1. > * gnu/packages/dns.scm (bind)[license]: Change isc to mpl2.0. Thanks! I see that ISC recommends this release for production use, although it is labeled "Early Deployment" instead of "Current-Stable". You can see this production "endorsement" if you hover your mouse over the "Early Deployment" text in the BIND tab: https://www.isc.org/downloads/ Does anyone see a reason to stick to the 9.10 release series for now? And, should we stick the 9.9 release series for isc-dhcp's bundled BIND replacement? > - (license (list license:isc)))) > + (license (list license:mpl2.0)))) In case anyone is wondering, ISC relicensed BIND to the MPL2.0 in BIND 9.11.0: https://www.isc.org/blogs/bind9-adopts-the-mpl-2-0-license-with-bind-9-11-0/ --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkIwrIACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjIjw/9GqPInKrbS0RLhY4+QwaGGzn0U/X9mEsyNMbH/h05VY0162IKdTi/XyH+ cT3IM5PV/AhZidRAKMhr6zbCtZtmmgJVMsnOoWm1tCFOYsdGo8z75xpWjWjyw3Nf JYhYQGh6j23+sP2Fa4dFMTJJybL/R3uWYY0Jlj5ZUlamNqp53uZs7boXcvhnbLFh I4np6D7oZNjcD637E8LDp/jRO6Et69TlYj0NV92e+nuA/JMgRB+nN0RfJ46rCiAr /d/dZFHq14+tO/a/lOhvCcT2Gg9lQbI3pOK9hbBoR5+KQTkY5JmisUgL0Mz0BN1z /Wr1HrBcAqJZjB1WGr3fgrcrJfOnqPC11XzHr5qsj7T/tIl3vsJyGU7ZvHGcFD2y 3zg0KcLwEIYqEmhYud+7fe9h4N/aZ6WWYtadE3/pTOMmG0umSCnysyRLslzPQsxC swK98NLni6s3eEXHxEHqehi2fDOhte7wtxhN6f0skKEsyfX5e0xlD/GI18BVevCc LUx0RFj3gXOgwbSsoyx/sc8ZQ+xqSyuWr8KmGEdnmXZUc2HJEzbisgt/W/ripeby Q/e8Yyd1gGqNCpMYAAzPpZeRGYqoJTEGrxDG59F/ar17179IogVIGDzlxsV+nTRI L0P0Qe2DZ5xm5/V7fxed744a99hW87iwklabosPUfqaoD+PN7x8= =B+uP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ--