From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petter Subject: Re: Doc: reference to guix-devel for submitting patches Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:21:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20170430182117.5c235a3d@mykolab.ch> References: <20170426180210.1efae0c4@mykolab.ch> <87inlmhaq8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/1DWkB0WBxfNgPqdhPfO_N6D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4rbM-0005cJ-GP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:21:37 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4rbI-0006gB-Ek for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:21:36 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.1]:22604 helo=mx-out03.mykolab.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d4rbI-0006dT-7h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:21:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87inlmhaq8.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/1DWkB0WBxfNgPqdhPfO_N6D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 19:48:15 -0700 Chris Marusich wrote: >=20 > Yes, this wording is unclear. It could be interpreted as an invitation > to send bug reports and patches to guix-devel@, which is not quite > right. >=20 > On related note, I see there is a section on submitting patches ((guix) > Submitting Patches), but there is no similar, dedicated, section on > submitting bugs (i.e., to bug-guix). >=20 > > > > And here, > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Packaging-Guidelines= .html#Packaging-Guidelines > > the user is referred to the Contributing node. =20 > >> Once your package builds correctly, please send us a patch (see > >> Contributing). =20 > > > > I think at least one of the latter two nodes could use an update to bet= ter > > inform the soon-to-be-contributor that patches should go to guix-patche= s. > > Not sure what the better fix is though. > > > > What do you think? > > =20 >=20 > Seems to me like we should clarify the wording in the "Contributing" > section. And maybe we should add a "Submitting Bug Reports" > sub-section, similar to the "Submitting Patches" one. >=20 > Do you think you could try your hand at writing this? >=20 Alright, I'll give it a go. Will post to guix-patches then. --Sig_/1DWkB0WBxfNgPqdhPfO_N6D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEB+Ude/iUmL3PehPCvgTmz6aYnSEFAlkGDv0ACgkQvgTmz6aY nSFufA//Tp/+xH3IKeQ1nJNUBQ5G+K026TCPyId6Q2hF7WTp/OIkdtJk5cE0bBJY XohpFwi4wy6K/SlKpGR0ZjqsiKKBZfI7lPU1WbY+G4CKATnsxY5eDfTvZcfBGdB+ 0j/zwKkJnx8jZZCN+EymCI3HvOWqYg5FBDpa0lW1BOGtss3vOflSXzrkdwBn3fcs x0gVFAONA7mZb+7s+qup8csOwg8vk5ewmpbMN1FOI3jN8DKShDo+QugHJ6G48AhC Hc9AKKpox2z2xJU8pLNshiSAGwE/F44onXAVKUETWpk/luPjbRjx+xzp4riXGJji Brq9/ZT9AjBc3+J1S4YeDJSOR103HocVQSa2zZg4p73WYwP1iN2RVsRuM6bC6q9A iReYesMY2nesrpaWOmI2c4b5q5c0FpsMeV1iOOCWfRBHh+NosvvG1L9NEMafXW/t a3rg3XAfHJcyyoVpKIYZacOnUi0VciMsHzDFoB8+FtqZOEdaI8pgSNerVSp6cNzd OQV0ZwuvFR9fGpy2kqbCQWAEkLtgoNy2YcJBHnv0kTq53Gdug94Q7x49lz0WNFYW 58e8B8jGntrg2hiNH6cxuLrTyLl/u6Po9ogI+6wH2WdFlTFaH4+LRj67O+1ZgPH/ wPMq8tdhOksFI7LaseDl+Srz84P59+U7SZbkRJjAbSwypmzViZI= =HHqV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1DWkB0WBxfNgPqdhPfO_N6D--