From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: 26610@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26610: python-gpg broke; python-gpg 1.9.0 does not exist
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 18:43:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170422224307.GA6373@jasmine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737d0761f.fsf@dustycloud.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1270 bytes --]
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:37:00AM -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> Commit 8439c9c05e upgraded gpgme to 1.9.0.
>
> Unfortunately, python-gpg's version is tied to gpgme:
>
> (define-public python-gpg
> (package
> (name "python-gpg")
> (version (package-version gpgme))
> ;; [...]
>
> This is a problem, because upgrading gpgme "automatically" upgraded
> python-gpg, and there is no python-gpg release of 1.9.0. The latest
> release is 1.8.0:
>
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gpg/1.8.0
I'd hoped the GPGME maintainers would release new versions of python-gpg
in tandem with GPGME, but since that's not the case, we should not use
gpgme's package-version in python-gpg.
Can you try it? I'm not an assword user, so I can't adequately test the
combination of gpgme-1.9.0 and python-gpg-1.8.0.
> I'm not sure it makes sense to tie the package version to python-gpg's
> package version anyway... if upgrading gpgme does trigger the upgrade of
> python-gpg "automatically", then that would mean that even if there was
> a pythong-gpg available with the new version, the hash would be
> incorrect.
Right, this technique doesn't work if one forgets to update the other
packages... as I forgot to do in this case :)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-22 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-22 16:37 bug#26610: python-gpg broke; python-gpg 1.9.0 does not exist Christopher Allan Webber
2017-04-22 22:43 ` Leo Famulari [this message]
2017-05-26 19:51 ` Ivan Vilata i Balaguer
2017-05-27 14:11 ` Leo Famulari
2017-06-01 8:43 ` Ivan Vilata i Balaguer
2017-06-02 3:22 ` Leo Famulari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170422224307.GA6373@jasmine \
--to=leo@famulari.name \
--cc=26610@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.