From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#26581: Leftover patch round-up Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:06:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20170421220654.GA32126@jasmine> References: <20170420182538.GA11903@jasmine> <87d1c5a26q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59515) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1gik-0007qp-JE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:08:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1gig-0002Sq-JV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:08:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1gig-0002Sk-Fj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:08:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1gig-0002Yp-AL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:08:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1c5a26q.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26581@debbugs.gnu.org --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:19:41PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > gcc-libiberty-printf-decl.patch: Added in > > b810a85019ab3c4ee1f889d0751b8eb06157dadc and mentioned in the > > commit message but never used, AFAICT. Ludo? >=20 > It was used for 5.3 (commit e3d0fcbf7e55e8cbe8d0a1c5a24d73f341d7243b, > which the commit above reinstated; see > ) but useless in > 5.4. So yes, can be removed! Ah, thanks for sharing the context. > Except for this one: >=20 > > gnu/packages/patches/readline-7.0-mingw.patch: Introduced in > > ae12d586275cdd96db23fb01bf840b2055b5b979, but never used. Jan, can you > > take a look? >=20 > =E2=80=A6 it looks like you can go ahead and remove=E2=80=99em all! Done as 04b906799168008c41f62402eee74bd47c1c2681. > Maybe we should add a makefile target to check for stale patches? We're discussing it here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00439.html I'll leave this bug open while we decide what to do about readline-7.0-mingw.patch. --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlj6gn4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwj//BAA3NWDzkzSQpIDmFgtyukwwYZpf8K+hhgLUPOKFYCd2gFdzsjjpmTlqM07 e4IyAzyOZmNf6PsTEzedpGm7LNfzdZMQLqA2/7GU8C24lF12tw7ZBr0wRz4smc2L 9cu95llfehnHoeWGpmqC2JlAqIbABo8WsjP6T3TG/5mRVHwcz2FwUaYI01vzovjk lmLXJO3R4iJa/BrdlTpxqhb3unVKyuhcU8Rr81SetF+NIu+wU9I6ZSlP3umUR7Og bFPXjSKXVG5pc4/73O4pKduE8IV40L5P4vj2AAfR955oOflaDD9oGz+mu4PvAnRW V5+dVwxR2NIxwu7MfKYNui1LSbyxutRzKkxKY2O669T97wQI8jLXYL9Swdgcelgo zuPkBCKZye3mFt3FbxzZHAP2TtIiGCLvczCaIQ0S7r+eeglU+n6AKJf7YTkyrOMM Nr4krhiIhug8XNCR88pP0J1Jmp2d9RUYN3fwmhjdJS46TrjHYUpCKWBIm0hHFLeC MljTosmR8+QLby7z2FQCD4BirVohca9T7DXPICnLzunAJ/gXWBNrUhRfuTtBsuOR 7yYFWrj4teQF0K3jaThF7Ar9SJGY8O6fu3LCX5kGBNM4/zrX9g/Y5U3BWdx//EBV vSEdu2G6LM9XFiKjG7bhP/4Fo0IzAaVKagQSUWa4PVMvpi+H8Mk= =IwgI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--