From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: 01/02: gnu: qemu: Update to 2.9.0 [security fixes]. Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:02:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20170421190240.GA26110@jasmine> References: <20170420182405.2682.82446@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170420182405.ED2D520740@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87zifa602c.fsf@netris.org> <20170421173742.GA3370@jasmine> <8737d1zk6n.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1dpT-0004Wn-1s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:02:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1dpQ-0007mY-01 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:02:51 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1dpM-0007jI-13 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:02:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8737d1zk6n.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:31:44PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 09:06:51PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > >> FAIL: grub_cmd_set_date > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > >> Has anyone else seen this? > > > > I just ran the build 5 times on my x86_64 machine, and it failed this > > test 1/5 times. > > > > We could try patching the test file with 'set -x' to trace the execution > > of the script and see exactly what goes wrong. >=20 > Of course it would be good to investigate, but for now, here is the > patch that I used to disable that one test. > From 3ea154ed0dff96c348a0ee5a3a45678fc8a1dfb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Mark H Weaver > Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:45 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] DRAFT: gnu: grub: Disable failing test. >=20 > * gnu/packages/bootloaders.scm (grub)[arguments]: Add 'disable-failing-te= st' > phase. Okay, sounds good. Can you forward this report to ? By the way, I'm testing the latest release of grub, 2.02~rc2, and this test is flaky there, too. --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlj6V0sACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi2DRAAsS6dkqXzxEOjVc4lSUl7p/L+6Q1dr6eXPFx2pyfk18mm1iuZloNQwl4k r8G+HmI6NvPk/Nz/5zU15V3lS+xYgjlXdarFMetJUjdtzTopjLrQNgxj/DQ+nqGN mRBEedTinOxjYaMq/q2Q1DmIizEvr+mEV6CQQ1MmdPpTpmzcIOX0u1PplDhjkNxs pUTcf/a/RfhoFxdg3WwYaSFXOgPzxBQZ+vglonHartd5EKsNxNMIusF5zxWDI74I jRAoxfaAaWAfPDOh1TagIP8D6pP7wZt05jH7w9BHZJ4pdujiF0mhtzJqUi3CwKyp yBJS0s8wjNaPb+m01/hXAv3hWNDJ659PnQrZD96C+0XrVvsFT5PhQ7KQB3zxCWNj CiHNI/uv/aUCfrXbMzZIy2GtOeTvuIlju9GSIQebLgDkzbxlWMGv0+3lp1jS04Dh 3HU6uzm5Go0tlth4s6peVjcYnsrHSwSZNHn+k64toDW1wOF3Kk9LTkEgofOzYQYL NqodlUGSZ24Z4M/eoQNW4AuAfeuopbWWl5FiDzK0EoKYY9a+c1lFsuOYAilVfT3I KuMFd6BhiVFWY4WucEENLnJfkDP3Zev84bKNEy9Q08yDOpqkM0c5XqMKmsNMMavx X1LrZ+IwRSLjF55aViVH4n9Je6h9U4VtZ+apQB/P9BdodvZqCJE= =x/Q6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--