From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: NSS test failure on armhf Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:52:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20170417215234.GA32573@jasmine> References: <874lxmlodc.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EZg-00084e-BG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:52:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EZd-0002t1-8U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:52:44 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:42429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EZa-0002sA-HC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:52:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874lxmlodc.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:23:43PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Hello! >=20 > Since version 3.30.1, one test consistently fails on armhf. It is the > same as in this bug report, although we don't see the exception: >=20 > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1351459 >=20 > I initially thought this was due to stalls in the build process as we've > seen before and tried increasing the timeouts in a790f2620, but that > should probably be reverted. >=20 > What should we do? We can either patch out this test, or go back to > 3.30. Here are the release notes for 3.30.1: >=20 > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.30.1_= release_notes >=20 > It fixes a non-public bug in the base64 implementation, but introduced a > test failure on at least two arches. >=20 > Any preference? Since there were no changes to the set of certificates between 3.30 and 3.30.1 [0], I would revert it for now. [0] https://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS:Release_Versions --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlj1OR8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwimMg/+LleHws5aIqOCyswqeAOTqvit8ySBsAULYuNXrehdw5kcpnps8oXgmQfe h78ZVhxvidxOqz8s7AUzylwzprXG53xLDEtwHNrX9nJycADxtEj2biLWRAUa4hXq RRdW8zcqRUmYMvKfKwHZlWCz2DPe5k7lZkFa6pGQfl+Tm5ZPl+K3Dtrqi2qHppTu K7cGSHcjFhSjOF+WIHyMJdl7/GvLBhplmHIrMd93YhW36ErKCZPgE6nUuy7Z04hY sO9KYR/e28oxahzbJ9FHzQ8aK908038B2kI/LQOi0fY5Vxbu1CwbnJ+gDpLZnM4y pKu7bb1mNORXKmIKG70JdrgW+hm6YtEW/oo+9VMWr1M66iYVZ6Wd1w4GWv+nFtic Q3u5zkgb+zpBnjK6aA2mjgIW/852sl0GN5KA63I9TMmEw6yfTjfDHVgacu2p83S2 YbJ4JbqznluwBUGQLNMLDZCCb0D/ICWQ2VTXFtUs50tSRHorMRhZVFpymIGwx7tW fs/Uta4p1xajKokxfSlspkBuY2qWfjy4u7k2VqxeFWLwfjzOR2X0Vv4vMrvNw7mM OI2+N/DPUPDSyM/QeAH2Ojcy8maIxNgmKvFbUt6sQqPfMXZMaHYBA0J6HtMOhnOU fCIOyaxLuew/gvnj9rsrO60tzs6DQd59Jsoy2Id5CCT3t4wfCvI= =UWHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--