From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: go: Update to 1.8.1 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:18:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20170417181839.GA24114@jasmine> References: <7f4cf1ee6c558899e8c9457102c2e0d4@mykolab.ch> <20170417135418.0bf12c87@sf> <1e60418d89b070a52d90ef4b3f08eba3@mykolab.ch> <20170417171822.GA8224@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53760) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0BEe-00019n-MH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:18:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0BEb-0008DK-Gf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:18:48 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:56541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0BEa-0008B3-Cx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:18:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Petter Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:55:35PM +0200, Petter wrote: > Hi Leo, >=20 > Good point! As the build succeeded I didn't think any of it. This could be > important for other architectures than what Sergei and I are using. >=20 > However, > > find /tmp/go/src/cmd/ -name '*asm\.c*' > doesn't return any file. Looks like they've removed these files. I'm pret= ty > sure they're working to "free" their source of C code, so I wouldn't expe= ct > these files to reappear in a later release either. Indeed, I must have been looking at an old version of the Go source tree. > With this information I think it's safe to remove the asm.c substitution. Yup! I pushed the update as c04ef86e8114225f5e5859f379582ba6f69aacfb. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlj1Bv4ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgKTA/9FQXjtTxAA4CybwbH2nuzVVe7yu7b+5ztfGPZ6yox7aO72fzWW+YD+0ms AOc/rEOIfuvolTXGkBalyCDd9k69oDOlVK0q86acpI+ZaCdRxwWIr85Qxdx0PTmY W3LFjMOlcUD+lkna4HqvAA/VhuWeAT1tnV3RHO5r+TjhuIf/8Idfv9RHf54DoLTd bE56gJXj38m4LUfDaBkJ4isdh8S5kDFSRS6DafOm/PsNoaMPK2iBWJ+8ERQhz/SH vWsMtUOqpmJqfx6P7uZCjrRqXm8hTMbJjx0ljIX8P+d3YMalMoMqfR94U1r6W1OJ U6bLK8/5oww2u1N1XWjjEy03eCoG50GTyvxmc1B8FE1bzao42/q18v/wasj/Jwve OsCDDJN5F9QltLcxRSDqh597W57XLlM+dLOXm/iQM6MubQB+DwriIA6WLcNd/OeP ZEUyas63U35uvWjbvamnWcEVukuIVQileWBELEIeOjtsNgrNm58LqS2fTVu3fELc 7jec+CJX3sZWp/PtEoNkVno0t+zlatRR8ghXWQPSHxvR5rSLFmWc+e7SnUNI/MIs uXaFXYUgdvETHKfVCrC5PNZVdcSxRqMFKxpfwCEQiUtemqTJH9UovAOgvd3jaQ6Z Psik/mgtxaqZsHinb5tNPNo4gwNv7WttwfInaczbGdhJ1XWYS9k= =m1C6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--