From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: 01/02: gnu: libressl: Update to 2.5.3. Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:48:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20170414164830.GA29891@jasmine> References: <20170412011114.29557.46901@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170412011115.CE2FF220BE@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87pogioukr.fsf@netris.org> <20170412152029.GA5920@jasmine> <87mvbkny4y.fsf@gnu.org> <20170413185921.GD14931@jasmine> <87shlbdurt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cz4On-00042v-Ev for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:48:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cz4Ok-0006co-6H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:48:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shlbdurt.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 02:43:34PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I would suggest bumping the kernel requirement in glibc on the next > core-updates cycle (well, the current one!) and also making sure all our > build machines run the right thing. > > In the meantime, I’d apply the above hack, and hopefully we can remove > it in a couple of months. > > How does that sound? Sounds good to me! Hopefully the libressl-portable developers choose to handle ENOSYS in a future release.