From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Issues while updating fossil to 2.1 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:15:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20170412161558.eihlgkz723n7crcl@abyayala> References: <20170411102505.r2lbvt4comdkwvi6@abyayala> <20170411103231.ekdwanepvptwxiy7@abyayala> <20170412153915.GE5920@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyKwC-0004Dr-5Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:16:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyKw7-0007J5-Vs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:16:08 -0400 Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([2001:888:2000:56::19]:31167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyKw7-0007Ho-MX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:16:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170412153915.GE5920@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari transcribed 0.8K bytes: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:32:31AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > ng0 transcribed 4.7K bytes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > my editor wraps at 80 lines but I hope the errors are obvious for > > > someone who did fix fossil before (Efraim?). > > > Could it be that not all tests have been updated for the new format? > > > > Looking at their timeline > > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci), commits like > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/6167f69a218804bd > > suggest that there are issues. However I guess we can use nothing after > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?c=303a2084a35beec1&unhide > > where they updated sqlite to 3.18 beta and later they updated to 3.18 > > (released?). > > Has fossil made a release that depends on sqlite 3.18? I think we will > offer this version of sqlite before most distros, but not immediately; > it was released only 2 weeks ago. > https://fossil-scm.org is always running the HEAD of fossil, and because they are very closely connected to sqlite I think that's the reason why the implement use of new versions as soon as possible. No release has been published, but commits are already made with 3.18. -- PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/