From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Issues while updating fossil to 2.1 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:39:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20170412153915.GE5920@jasmine> References: <20170411102505.r2lbvt4comdkwvi6@abyayala> <20170411103231.ekdwanepvptwxiy7@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyKMc-00023r-Ab for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:39:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyKMY-0001v1-B6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:39:22 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:32915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cyKMY-0001us-6v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:39:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (c-73-165-108-70.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.165.108.70]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7E62424734 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:39:16 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170411103231.ekdwanepvptwxiy7@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:32:31AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > ng0 transcribed 4.7K bytes: > > Hi, > > > > my editor wraps at 80 lines but I hope the errors are obvious for > > someone who did fix fossil before (Efraim?). > > Could it be that not all tests have been updated for the new format? > > Looking at their timeline > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci), commits like > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/6167f69a218804bd > suggest that there are issues. However I guess we can use nothing after > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?c=303a2084a35beec1&unhide > where they updated sqlite to 3.18 beta and later they updated to 3.18 > (released?). Has fossil made a release that depends on sqlite 3.18? I think we will offer this version of sqlite before most distros, but not immediately; it was released only 2 weeks ago.