From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: Issues while updating fossil to 2.1 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:44:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20170411104412.tilyeuj577mkhdfj@abyayala> References: <20170411102505.r2lbvt4comdkwvi6@abyayala> <20170411103231.ekdwanepvptwxiy7@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxtHZ-00028h-Pb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:44:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxtHW-0002Rz-N4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:44:21 -0400 Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([82.94.249.234]:26736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxtHW-0002RQ-CV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:44:18 -0400 Received: from [82.94.249.234] (latitanza [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated sender: niasterisk@grrlz.net) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D0A8120CBF for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170411103231.ekdwanepvptwxiy7@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 transcribed 5.3K bytes: > ng0 transcribed 4.7K bytes: > > Hi, > > > > my editor wraps at 80 lines but I hope the errors are obvious for > > someone who did fix fossil before (Efraim?). > > Could it be that not all tests have been updated for the new format? > > Looking at their timeline > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci), commits like > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/6167f69a218804bd > suggest that there are issues. However I guess we can use nothing after > https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?c=303a2084a35beec1&unhide > where they updated sqlite to 3.18 beta and later they updated to 3.18 > (released?). > > I'll just see if including appropriate commits from their timeline fixes > the tests. > There's also an OpenSSL-1.1.0 related bug which was fixed since the release of fossil 2.1, reported by Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847556#10 I think we should update to at least https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/8c22e1bbcd8ec048 I don't know when they plan to release version 2.2, but it will require a version of sqlite we do not have. Would it be okay to fall back to the bundled one then? -- PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/