From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39673) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ct8mv-0005Jy-P9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:17:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ct8ms-00061E-IG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:17:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ct8ms-00060x-EC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ct8ms-0007rh-2X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 04:17:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26248: Should we recompile Vala code in LXDE? Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 08:16:46 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20170329081646.h6xahvisnvvj7uqz@abyayala> References: <20170325002448.ghzfxtyix4vzhukz@abyayala> <874lydtanf.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <874lydtanf.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26248@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.3K bytes: > Oh, another comment: some of the packages, such as lxsession, contain C > code generated from Vala (the tarball contains both the Vala source and > the generated C code.) > > I don’t think there’s a precedent (?), but we may want to remove the > generated code and rebuild it from source. > > Thoughts? > > Ludo’. > Yes, we should definitely do that.