From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add python-sphinx-1.5.2, python-sphinx-1.5.3 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:03:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20170328200354.GB13687@jasmine> References: <20170326092335.3912-1-fredmanglis@gmail.com> <20170326092335.3912-2-fredmanglis@gmail.com> <20170326151058.GB13943@monza> <20170327151100.GB16027@jasmine> <20170327151234.GA16259@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csxLT-00009g-9J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:04:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csxLP-0007s3-MM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:03:59 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:46472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csxLP-0007rw-JK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:03:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170327151234.GA16259@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Frederick Muriithi Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:12:34AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:11:00AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:32:49PM +0300, Frederick Muriithi wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > > > Hi Fred, > > > > > > > > Why do we need both versions? > > > > > > >=20 > > > We don't. I noticed there was a newer version (1.5.3) while working on > > > version 1.5.2, and thought to just add it, since it wasn't much > > > effort. > > >=20 > > > If it's ever explicitly needed, it'll be defined already. Is that > > > okay, or should I refrain from that in the future? > >=20 > > Thanks! If mando works with 1.5.3, we should just use that. Otherwise, > > let's leave 1.5.3 out for now, to avoid needless building on Hydra. >=20 > Or leave out 1.5.2, since your mando package is using 1.5.3 :) Pushed without 1.5.2, thanks! --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljawaoACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjsOg//fJYcl0pc5tmf7xc2DSujF/TPbRm54vIf41Lwk65iWGqnh+lmUjzsw6Ah 6RDtArKWqbtACkHVgOlUVVo2ZXV5tvbRQEa/7wE54OOGeodANs3UAMxuligNh3Tc gPYiexlGkPzgclGrIBZMnn/P5zaufTzliQWFIu6d5ujdUVKtnPwq9uIyw8tPz3LM sUDkW8VDWuzShjLjZsPmW9wnRyZDM3P8wQ4gphabmeC7x2wyObaP8s+eaddivtRv 6VgInInLTlr19+1xyCQRFv9u/wlRjIIacKiFU5CSi6FZF66HwRUNU4lAeJNrUacs XVJPtApc+zZv1Mi9t3tGAE3WI3on+GRi9iU852SgD2X4apSrVcH5lh9Fs+d+TqvJ uo09m/J6DO4O3R7eVDCPv8uoRk4rFn6zYUqRmX96iJrsCptV+a2tVt2ShrexhIUH QRG4c2bW7Tk39JXhi+9dfkwHE0cyInfGI5e1a3Dam/H7HClBkfIYs6MjCnlbQt/A 6ddqypJdRXfLm3FdN1+/MZ0D+ByZwvI6axTmbOrkOh9qPKB6kQhzkQQ5fNY5GPay O/wXjRd4e7tJvkyHuXAB2z0qfnEfljH/bJFRsUNCxwRSBY2LLvGcnwq+joeDFEZ7 yzDRMlK6qaDjvqXGU93B+fLm1Yp9IElrR+SOXpFR7NfN7KiatYc= =lx/D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN--