From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22125: bless: non deterministic failure Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:48:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20170328184833.GD32451@jasmine> References: <8737vbfxhr.fsf@netris.org> <5DB7C49C-25E1-4F86-A71C-108875B5D5B0@purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cswAz-0000cb-TP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:49:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cswAw-0000II-RH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:49:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cswAw-0000I3-P4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cswAw-0001aJ-G4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:49:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5DB7C49C-25E1-4F86-A71C-108875B5D5B0@purdue.edu> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: "Branson, Joshua A" Cc: "22125@debbugs.gnu.org" <22125@debbugs.gnu.org> --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:42:36PM +0000, Branson, Joshua A wrote: > It looks like bless is building fine. It had two recent failures (March = 2017), but more recent correct builds. =20 >=20 > http://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/core-updates/bless-1p02.x86_64-linux >=20 > I also see other builds of bless working just fine here:=20 >=20 > http://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/master/bless-1p02.x86_64-linux >=20 > http://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/release-0.12.0/bless-1p02.x86_64-linux >=20 > Perhaps this is not a huge issue anymore? It may be an issue but not a huge issue. It would be good to know what's going on, though. --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljasAAACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg/ug/+NUso1KLjyWmOD1vk6TqkANJ/vYHmqG/gcp2/rILK/UqJ/F9u7UxLKsCF Wr0smHXxP7cgsV6XaJbF3+c7EyDz/yk7jlBQGAr/Fc7ne4KyvResaFXxpFRdJFHd vgxFotDuSl4uMDZhXKGm7cFlLzwF0KQls6ty+AQiLJKHt+ewbzBdKLHylDGTwi46 Ps+k8clsVqLNRxMVwnbWggzfb4pEGbGC0vRr8k5pW69rhHFYkqE6kZPjcD6X4Iap H7Lk90T6w3Gp5loY16cRTMK9/4xWw5G24i36ogwN8FmULwFYWUr0rhEa2N6oi1ic OmRfrHHwgnMuk+I3UhJl+e64x05KtgYiu7kWSh92J9IPF0ctbT/v6vbjpaK1QpH2 ELkxjjkrJEUk4IsmlI4F9v8QePObuDwyvQ9USvGa3qR7siBhAd/5OTQA0ChdcoOJ BH27Oj6uO57BcdNTNiqYYFpdKZ+7vxkp8SOVKl980KeWJTAglp/QWENe4fV5bCXD C/rBfp5HNPuC1e0FhyRrlONssPiqVEA9QhuuiC6Mr5M4nGnoX/y7X9Uey0LjbmhH DHqhJoybY42/+Ne7g9q67lE/dbRx2oAWKTR5VpW1rnB2ukiKPEwMrerUrtqmI6CM Tpq+Dn0aeG7GcgiuMZDxUgqGqLe2sHdFeyVYdbfGXci6eimqfPY= =fcRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2Z2K0IlrPCVsbNpk--