From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Add python-sphinx-1.5.2, python-sphinx-1.5.3 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:12:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20170327151234.GA16259@jasmine> References: <20170326092335.3912-1-fredmanglis@gmail.com> <20170326092335.3912-2-fredmanglis@gmail.com> <20170326151058.GB13943@monza> <20170327151100.GB16027@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csWK0-0002Ri-D2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:12:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csWJv-0002PS-D9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:12:40 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:38455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csWJv-0002PC-AO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:12:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170327151100.GB16027@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Frederick Muriithi Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:11:00AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:32:49PM +0300, Frederick Muriithi wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > > Hi Fred, > > > > > > Why do we need both versions? > > > > >=20 > > We don't. I noticed there was a newer version (1.5.3) while working on > > version 1.5.2, and thought to just add it, since it wasn't much > > effort. > >=20 > > If it's ever explicitly needed, it'll be defined already. Is that > > okay, or should I refrain from that in the future? >=20 > Thanks! If mando works with 1.5.3, we should just use that. Otherwise, > let's leave 1.5.3 out for now, to avoid needless building on Hydra. Or leave out 1.5.2, since your mando package is using 1.5.3 :) --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljZK+IACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjVOxAAhWsCjQAuXZVt6N43zrDVBKmDitzitbTS+fM/3OdquvVMIOtojY40qaw+ Svp3Eye29K85T1vrNZBWIwWUCriavZK4wpcRZSiB9aHqhTBBepTQcNidBk0vb0+y 5arhpsoi+65QHLFhgkGBwbt48N0KT2+g3kd5qMw2zNEbceuF1Ys6Avkn4YBC3LBY 36feDDS7M+D5bs21UPPkK31SXLKmN3nnMoD23CkbsWXjEat05QXdKy4CqNs6rUo6 uqSybwlwt8wtoP+siv7tYQbEkyBgMVrJa6j/jI3+EgxgkGM7mBuMseQq5ksk1eR6 1tmkFUD54myLOyn5zL78st3Iy7RQIP90W5hggWYT1AGmpPw8IGHv4kixtfhThXL8 fsq4C56nQDI2DClgRdVBuP0aJ+fprstRQh91k+CkWs6pfmCwIdAWUa79erGwcklc ahyGX126kf7LCHbGC91pmm+pY1oqBpuEWtHMaQ00LuwbyOH2WaKTW9Nq0sdUFb8R bwjmq8DJ+VgzfI6mNqhzCIDShkGtjGBnKwF6gvrSHQdoTCJmk8iGAzujs4mcwFgF lzwslSaad8vstPFivA5dB3ryiG4LnWBs1lq4F9MXKer+QceNqbBtpvI1OLXiUGWT 5dBofyTvOhKdgizeBMVod4x2llEevQg8qFbb3WwO1k5bAdeC1PA= =Z878 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--