On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to by > a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may occasionally > forget if that person wants feminine pronouns and is 6'4" and has an enormous > black wiry beard. [I really don't know what your intention is with that last paragraph ??? I will just ignore it, as I wouldn't want to ascribe malice???] OMG! What is wrong here? Why would you (or anyone) think this is malicious? The intention, which I thought was clear, is that if people make unusual requests we should try to accommodate those requests, but the requestor should not be suprised or offended if people don't always remember. Surely that was obvious? It is the same with the Linux vs. GNU/Linux thing. When speaking for GNU, I request people to say GNU/Linux when talking about the operating system. However, I recognise that some people have been exposed to "Linux" for a long time, and it is hard to break the habit of a lifetime instantly. Therefore, I don't jump on someone saying "Gotcha" if they once forget. I will however give them a polite and gentle reminder. Regarding your other comments, as we have discussed before, we will have to agree to disagree about singular they. I have not the benefit of ever having learned English as a foreign language. But I do remember in my elementary school being taught NOT to use it *especially* not in written text. And - perhaps because of this early tuition - it still sounds clumsy and confusing to me. People having been talking about being "welcoming". Well, I beleive the way to achieve that is threefold: 1. Try not to offend. 2. Try not to be offended. 3. Recognise that diversity is an asset. J' -- Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email. PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.