Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option.

[ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>]

Mathieu Lirzin transcribed 1.4K bytes:
> ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net> writes:
> 
> > John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes:
> >
> >> I am glad that at least one person can express a point of view  and be polite about
> >> it at the same time.   If you think it is fine, then it is your right to use it.
> >> 
> >> I find it confusing and clunky in most cases, and I refuse to use it.    I also
> >> reserve the right, when others advocate its use, to present my own point of view.
> >> 
> >> If anyone chooses  to  interpret that as rude, sexist, intolerant or whatever - then
> >> that is their problem and not mine.  They will have to get over it.
> >
> > Okay, so you are just one of those ignorant assholes who drive people
> > away from projects because they think their are the middle of the
> > universe and other problems don't exist because they have never
> > experienced them and oh deity forbid if someone insults their holy
> > grammarbooks and linguists. Cool. Glad that we have solved that.
> >
> > That's actually the first time that I'm not polite. But I can't be
> > polite to ignorant people. I just won't work with you anymore and ignore
> > you, as you choose to ignore other people with your behavior and
> > invalidate their existence and bother them with your view of what's
> > "correct" and what's not.
> 
> This reaction is highly intolerant and not acceptable in this community.
> Disagreeing doesn't justify being rude or insulting people.
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Lirzin
> GPG: F2A3 8D7E EB2B 6640 5761  070D 0ADE E100 9460 4D37
> 

May I remind you that the first reaction of John is being rude to anyone
who isn't a native speaker? Yes, my reply was rude and insulting, but if
you feel like supporting someone in that behavior in the first place
(which is disrespectful towards any newcomers who are not fluent in
english and additionally, not including, towards those who are not
binary) then this is indeed the wrong community. I don't see repetition
of John's behavior as solving the problem. It's not just in Email. It
happens on IRC too.
I doubt that inclusion of such behavior is according to the Code of
Conduct. If it is, please tell me so that I have social reasons to fork
Guix.