From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] services: openssh: Add 'subsystems' option. Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:09:52 +0000 Message-ID: <20170318110952.xhhobwl5ep4mlbpj@abyayala> References: <20170302084448.2ff6ce96@scratchpost.org> <87fuivxukg.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170305145026.zgoayn46kvpz5ksy@abyayala> <20170307214959.16038114@scratchpost.org> <87r3284x8s.fsf@lassieur.org> <87h92t1qts.fsf@gnu.org> <20170316204527.lnkgc2vot4uqk633@abyayala> <20170317053620.GA16076@jocasta.intra> <20170317162131.GA4354@jasmine> <20170317175802.GB30584@jocasta.intra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpCFI-0006XD-IP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:10:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpCFF-0005ZT-Cn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:10:04 -0400 Received: from fragranza.investici.org ([2a00:1dc0:2479::19]:45176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cpCFF-0005Z2-5J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:10:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170317175802.GB30584@jocasta.intra> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org John Darrington transcribed 2.0K bytes: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:21:31PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:36:20AM +0100, John Darrington wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:45:27PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > > ps Cl??ment: 'them'/'they' are pronouns if you don't know the gender and/or > > prefered pronoun of a person :) > > > > > > ... according to some. - but most linguists, and many orators (the president of > > the Free Software Foundation being one of them) consider this to be a misuse of > > the English language and refuse to (mis)use these words for such a purpose. > > As a native USA English speaker, I think this usage is fine, and widely > accepted by speakers, at least in this country. There are some cases > where it sounds a little clunky, but we don't have other words for this > use case that enjoy wider common usage. > > I am glad that at least one person can express a point of view and be polite about > it at the same time. If you think it is fine, then it is your right to use it. > > I find it confusing and clunky in most cases, and I refuse to use it. I also > reserve the right, when others advocate its use, to present my own point of view. > > If anyone chooses to interpret that as rude, sexist, intolerant or whatever - then > that is their problem and not mine. They will have to get over it. Okay, so you are just one of those ignorant assholes who drive people away from projects because they think their are the middle of the universe and other problems don't exist because they have never experienced them and oh deity forbid if someone insults their holy grammarbooks and linguists. Cool. Glad that we have solved that. That's actually the first time that I'm not polite. But I can't be polite to ignorant people. I just won't work with you anymore and ignore you, as you choose to ignore other people with your behavior and invalidate their existence and bother them with your view of what's "correct" and what's not. Have a nice life. > J' > > > > -- > Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email. > PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 > fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 > See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.