From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ImageMagick 7 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:34:52 -0500 Message-ID: <20170311173452.GA759@jasmine> References: <20170111201838.GB24185@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkuy-0007NR-8a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:35:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkut-0006aM-By for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:35:00 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:43167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmkut-0006Zc-61 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:34:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A3B32423E for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:34:54 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170111201838.GB24185@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:18:38PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > Hydra finished evaluating the imagemagick-updates branch on > x86_64-linux: >=20 > https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109433?full=3D1&compare=3Dmaster#tabs-now-fail >=20 > It's a surprisingly small number of failures! But, I wonder how many > packages that use ImageMagick use the "command-line API" and actually > test it. >=20 > So, I think we should carefully check each package that uses ImageMagick > directly to see if they are ready. We can check their commit logs and > bug trackers for anything related to ImageMagick. >=20 > It's a short list, and I'll start looking into a2ps and awesome: Hydra is chronically low on disk space. We don't have the resources to keep the historical substitutes for the imagemagick-updates branch's jobset [0], which hasn't seen any activity in a couple months. I'll delete the jobset in the next day or so unless there is more work on this task. Since the upstream maintainers will support ImageMagick 6 for at least ~9 more years, I think it's fine to stick with 6 while other distros with more volunteer-power evaluate which packages are able to use the new API. [0] https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/imagemagick-updates --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAljENTwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgdEhAAz2kb/EiRE9LefKUWrMYIcdDdHfpYqUGPMe6fsc61p36aNd4tkrbyIYYp LXacO1sLwX8RJGDJDshNC6w/YX6IdhUCqicCjDVJy0CYXEJcvtj47Yo4UvoD2665 SQZFYKh2aIcavmP+Nd///97upSyjJb5tbiDdoi+PVB6uLL3FfF4gBLtgftIhOCiL v4ldaXkTWXmf4QzMLunAGbcZnOEhLLsSYDV/tMOtOfCWW/8uBc/6iGLtvGolqBwS IKX/gSuyXJZxPF7tIdkg136BLjnSrntMtxxo5FOmyhklF2IKoirWV2/IxgmR55+N ensl92YBweMzycAL52Y5E4w4IUJiPFnQJ7GOWfnRNKXqVb+zBGmWRQ142bdoHQV5 diaxQXmCkD9eo7iCpjmgMjzt6JhQVSCGnF2s65F9vY0HNmAE9lrP0qTcwS/vxkIC pEw6vM3IJNxFZvg9+HVHSdbYGWXOSmBIlPERelhymiMO9b7rxbnAuyGDKQyxaGve hhK0+jKb5CCIkJ0GGpPpi5ShJx1iEnRNgrhj9GycworaYyCjK19ErBXXjnLWw/oR Lq6p1YEXmSdnd/l0VFyIDHEUFvs/l/QaRt8FXroBkE2MY7IQdBG8tOLDCSV8jdIM 6p0s/C/bA5V1I82zpnRSP/XSudJb8CACJTntVY6o/oT0sQ4V7WI= =ZCf7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--