From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: Could anyone help me to pack the shellcheck (haskell) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:34:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20170309193441.494c63b6@scratchpost.org> References: <87innkkm2e.fsf@163.com> <20170308220438.74ffa36c@scratchpost.org> <87mvcun0go.fsf@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm2ts-0000hU-JI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:35:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm2tn-0001C4-C7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:34:56 -0500 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:40190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cm2tn-0001Bu-4l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:34:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mvcun0go.fsf@163.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: guix-devel Hi, On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:39:19 +0800 "Huang\, Ying" wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:08:41 +0800 > > "Huang\, Ying" wrote: > > > >> I know very little about Haskell, but I use shellcheck > >> (https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck) to check my shell scripts. I > >> tried myself, but found it is hard for me. Could anyone help me on > >> that? > > Great! It works! Nice. Good to know that it works for you as-is. >Thanks a lot! Now I can use shellcheck. Could you > make it merged by Guix? Eventually, but it has to go through the normal review process in any case. Could you give some details for the description? I'm not a user of shellcheck so I have no idea what else to put there. Also, could you do a license review (check the shellcheck source files for header comments which say what license to use) and make sure it's actually gpl3 or later ? Then I'll post an updated patch to guix-patches (to be merged eventually after review) if you want.