From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 21:58:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20170307205848.42w2pusavz37dgwu@penguin> References: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine> <877f429kju.fsf@gnu.org> <20170306213434.GA25316@jasmine> <20170307063330.bhv2ugsvi3qeofu5@penguin> <20170307195118.GA30247@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oy5k7wlsbpwgj33u" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clMCF-00028w-CT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:59:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clMCE-0001xb-L7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:59:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clMCE-0001xW-Hf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:59:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clMCE-0005Vw-BE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:59:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170307195118.GA30247@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25852@debbugs.gnu.org --oy5k7wlsbpwgj33u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:33:30AM +0100, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:34:34PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> > > Leo Famulari skribis: >> > > >> > > > In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after= guix >> > > > pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant numb= er of >> > > > users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0. >> > > > >> > > > It seems unlikely that they have been updating all of root's >> > > > packages except for the guix package. Rather, I bet they never upd= ated >> > > > root's packages at all, for ~1 year. >> > >> > They could have been stuck with an old daemon if they copied the syste= md >> > or upstart service files we provide. >> > >> > That problem should be fixed by 613d0895b92c677e0639d5e77c55043e38e020= c8 >> > (build: Don't embed absolute paths in .service and .conf service >> > files.). >> >> That is right. But >> >> 1) there was no release with this "fix" >> 2) I (as distro package maintainer) didn't take this patch manually as >> it is fragile and hacky. Have you considered fresh guix installation? > >This will take effect for the next release of Guix; it addresses a >problem that arises when somebody installs the binary release of Guix. > >I'm not addressing downstream packages of Guix with this commit. I'm sorry, I may not understand correctly your answer. Are you saying that situation when user freshly installs Guix on system with systemd (and thus has empty /gnu/store)? S_W --oy5k7wlsbpwgj33u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAli/HwMACgkQSiPjT6Az Q21lzhAAgAJqd7dAoDv3yjR9CrCI5/wqupTcp1xWvr0XkMJKStvMgHRCSb80//63 d5GgEUpGOR6Qr/aanWLsK8yu4D6qepCPt3FrqqjHoeJmcNghXIxxzw84sPXrBsq1 ZJ4s5C4+MAC7X4UFMczlTCQrCL3YxqZmuKyB6+FDH1S9VO7WjZmGjJdU8J1YvY8a YRxE+599lq2Tg6AjcerqYvn9PHstcPcbBpdC4EHueryGBQ44CN6z1iENFdkutI2a ryL16r2O9jYySJPpGg+3DcAO1+pVWvXH17qEuVmBucVd1N7RvG3dxC2p/eJl5XpT MVYlcwI8CAOhjAsJm0LimzN0DUWVuz+A0JIJ9JnJGuo9TntJ6btv20iUwbT1ggui s1DtYxVHzL3EF8CMrahiq5jnIM35CtPyq2GEVXTEub80n4YHTSevqPBMh1adKKLA qUa/XLvyTbDZiqI8ycHg7kGZsvMfpf3lI/7UqrP/0qIKWzziCReJcwKFNrvinEH4 a+dnAOsPVdlCx2ryw8t52sDE/4S8hxk/+X3adZgkEaTMCz8wtN4HaQJSZxNUXaoP Ax7EyaT+fhDkIdpOngRKhshKjEH9ZP5Bg5V3Er8LE1jEnIeU03hgzT2FaZpyHdz4 CPbJE37/Sg2YwdX7bLxwv4Eq1/Slil5t7bEZC96LW8thMLJrYy4= =RI/5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oy5k7wlsbpwgj33u--