From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <contact.ng0@cryptolab.net>
Subject: bug#25273: midnight commander package fixes, opinions wanted
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:09:43 +0000
Message-ID: <20170306110942.bg4rdzesgqlrx7kq__41471.2618025534$1488794551$gmane$org@abyayala>
References: <20170301165841.ji65zi4rm2pypeql@abyayala>
	<20170301170123.37y4d36dziq6ewqo@abyayala>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33657)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ckpSw-0006CV-SW
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:02:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ckpSs-0007HW-VN
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:02:06 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43541)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ckpSs-0007HS-RU
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:02:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ckpSs-0004jt-JN
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:02:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25273.B25273.148879447518154@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170301170123.37y4d36dziq6ewqo@abyayala>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
Cc: 25273@debbugs.gnu.org

On 17-03-01 17:01:23, ng0 wrote:
> On 17-03-01 16:58:41, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I already fixed some of the open issues with our package of 'mc'.
> > 
> > I think people will expect features to just work and not being broken
> > (as they are right now).
> > My personal opinion ignored, how do you want to proceed? The vim way
> > where we have $package (basic, as small as it gets) and $package-full
> > (with all the features you can have enabled)?
> > 
> > I'd like to hear your opionion so that I can proceed fixing mc with
> > what we agreed on.
> > 
> 
> And also your opinion, I don't know what an opionion is but it sounds
> like opium combined with onion and I don't want that.
> 

For the lack of reaction for a long time, due to whatever reasons, I
will simply propose that we go the way of vim and vim-full.

'mc-full' will have many more dependencies than our current 'mc' and
should in the end be fully functional, while 'mc' will still complain
about missing features. The description of mc-full shall reflect that
you get full functionality with this application variant.

Anyone who wants this, feel free to pick it up and fix the related bug.