From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 21:29:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20170304202941.sgeprky4l2lda7xt@penguin> References: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kwyw76hjo5yzs57l" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckGJb-0004Y6-3o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:30:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckGJX-0004bT-S1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:30:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckGJX-0004bO-OO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:30:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckGJX-0006KX-E4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:30:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25852@debbugs.gnu.org --kwyw76hjo5yzs57l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 04:11:56PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix >pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of >users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0. > >It seems unlikely that they have been updating all of root's >packages except for the guix package. Rather, I bet they never updated >root's packages at all, for ~1 year. > >I think this is a serious documentation bug. One problem may be that Guix on top of foreign distribution is not able to update itself. I still offer guix-0.12 RPM package for openSUSE installation as there was no new release. Guix is able to update itself via `guix pull' but it doesn't affect system installation of guix-daemon. It would help splitting releases of Guix and guix-daemon. Best regards, S_W --kwyw76hjo5yzs57l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAli7I6cACgkQSiPjT6Az Q23obQ//RUTpI9mvaLPwkCeqNypeAZoIaim9pCz9oBbLyZy9Cc2EH+FbZQZ7yy13 AJXYambi/AMoOFN4m6aspXzj1BiKpm3xxGl8iT5gS4V9jRQGKo42jllZKNe4GaMY cMHqXHcNvlrA/bV4d6FK4xXxHWC8NNA11Xb2UL7y90KbJ/bKt+gB0ryjUcsV1ftL 2/M9E6cO682JEibuqxQxqmPr1aWyO0wyyHnBra25MXHByQpqgvtEpxv4bNBOG9bR 5WpaC7EqAp4UxQ9ihiXKIUkbIacXG5l6ovPx254MIawaC4Kf3sJEZdUpH9uuA0c6 Dzp21fnbM5WbkeNKyRIzquL5PFDeJI+26zBkPNss7U67/gp4gdaz5imjICrY36Vl uZ5U1XwbNJqxT55Rrn9gyGjhf4huedtwZHl7fA8xibitYyFPZd4pEWg1CbXUuAT/ OtsmnPCmMYMLiMc5znm/RjFV2Oiv5lrZ5DD4yyq6QtBuIjevxXmZhkAZamNwOrGv QXvOYFb7a2TWD4AmwcFE3Vu0SyJjbPkAUgnTpa8zDM5+lbL534flvsmD9ztXW0yU P/DI7MF50eDBATyJuOsZ8bYB/m3PYCJ2ZcijV5nQsl2dLlYePn5XxouC9oegmMf6 b7X7SBhy/0BWgBe6ZcKnIS3rvDsrLL3DTCPKpUWAIn8IukJbFls= =wqZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kwyw76hjo5yzs57l--